top | item 21334634 (no title) mikegioia | 6 years ago Fixing the bugs is one thing, but identifying that user reported bugs are in fact bugs is an entirely separate issue. The latter takes a ton of time, requires no developers, and is what everyone above you in this thread is talking about. discuss order hn newest jasonlotito|6 years ago The GP comment that spawned this thread said this:> If Apple also spent 10% of its revenue on processing bug reports and fixing bugs,"fixing bugs."So, fixing bugs is 100% part of the discussion here.But, let's ignore that for a second.Let's say Apple triages all its bugs, but then doesn't fix them.How is that an improvement? How is triaging the bugs but not fixing them at all an improvement?
jasonlotito|6 years ago The GP comment that spawned this thread said this:> If Apple also spent 10% of its revenue on processing bug reports and fixing bugs,"fixing bugs."So, fixing bugs is 100% part of the discussion here.But, let's ignore that for a second.Let's say Apple triages all its bugs, but then doesn't fix them.How is that an improvement? How is triaging the bugs but not fixing them at all an improvement?
jasonlotito|6 years ago
> If Apple also spent 10% of its revenue on processing bug reports and fixing bugs,
"fixing bugs."
So, fixing bugs is 100% part of the discussion here.
But, let's ignore that for a second.
Let's say Apple triages all its bugs, but then doesn't fix them.
How is that an improvement? How is triaging the bugs but not fixing them at all an improvement?