This is cute, but I'm dubious. It generated "y3aEmic8B217" as my password. Kid just happened to hit the shift key while also pressing E and then B? It looks a little too random to me. When I pound on the keyboard, I get results that look more like "fjlsd;lasf".
Yeah I also got a really weird password that needs shift and characters way to distant from the others to believe it's comming from a toddler
Guessing he's using 2 hands most likely you will get characters around the 1st one he pressed, so if you get a 's' character first, you can expect qweadzc near, but going from a 's' to a capital 'P' and then to a ! doesnt look legit to me
You guys are much too naive :) To me it seems obvious the site is just humorous and not serious. Of course the passwords have not been typed by a toddler but are simply generated randomly.
I guess the author wanted his site to have mild educational value, in that smashing your keyboard generates passwords stronger than the average password picked by people.
The site just sends a POST request for a password of the specified length, so there's no easy way to verify the site's claims. He did post his address on the Imprint page, so I guess someone in Germany could drive over there.
When I let my 5 months old investigate my keyboard, he changed my code, started the compiler and locked the device within 30 seconds. The secret? They use both hands. The give away? They re-press the same keys often, so the result would be a lot more repetitive.
Just to point out that human "smashing keyboard" is far from random.
Even if it weren't due to the keyboard's fixed layout (between two smashes), it's largely because of our non-random nature — a human being cannot reliably output random objects even in thought / speech. Don't ask me why (I don't think anyone knows or could prove it theoretically) but it's been verified countless times (war secrets help make such research important).
We're at best capable of pseudo-randomness mathematically. Some controversial neuroscience even places us far into the deterministic scope. A child is probably way more determined than an adult for that matter, due to a much simpler schema of reality, with 'weird obsessions' (e.g. it feels nice to smash the same place over and over again, our brain is quick to play games like that, such as walking on specific tiles to avoid the lava in the street).
I wouldn't trust most animals to output randomness. We have crypto packages suited for that purpose. ;-)
I am inclined to not trust the story here. Too many shady things going on. The passwords just seem like they are generated algorithmically so the whole underlying premise seems to be bs. The images can be found on a stock image site, they are asking for money and it's all done in a very shady way where the password is being generated serverside making it inherently insecure as a generator.
Seems like someone is using the imagery of a cute child to make a few extra bucks, at best.
Poor Max -- his dad's a developer, but he still has to work as a typist just to afford clean diapers, food, and toys. Everybody donate to this poor child's cause!
Joking aside, will I break this if I request too many characters? Does it loop after running out of Max's prior input? Is Max really just a script?
From experience with my kids when they were toddlers, they would type what they saw. I was kind of freaked out when my son typed "WARNING". They watched VHS tapes or DVDs that began with that message.
My toddler provides a whole security suite- she will set your critical files to readonly (by pulling all the keys of your keyboard), airgap your network (by playing with the power strip its connected to), and virus detection (by beginning to emit screams and snot as soon as she catches one) :)
I don't know what they're doing with the site design but it's completely devoid of text for me even with my adblocker turned off. I thought that was part of the gimmick at first until I realized there is text displayed for a fraction of a second before it finishes loading.
[+] [-] brianberns|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jefftk|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] firekvz|6 years ago|reply
Guessing he's using 2 hands most likely you will get characters around the 1st one he pressed, so if you get a 's' character first, you can expect qweadzc near, but going from a 's' to a capital 'P' and then to a ! doesnt look legit to me
[+] [-] mrb|6 years ago|reply
I guess the author wanted his site to have mild educational value, in that smashing your keyboard generates passwords stronger than the average password picked by people.
[+] [-] Mathnerd314|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] okusername|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] tardo99|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] WilliamEdward|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] iandanforth|6 years ago|reply
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/cute-baby-boy-sitti...
[+] [-] jvolkman|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sebazzz|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] marricks|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aloknnikhil|6 years ago|reply
Why does this need analytics and thus tracking cookies? I'm genuinely asking. What kind of data does this even need tracking?
[+] [-] 2pointsomone|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] K0SM0S|6 years ago|reply
Even if it weren't due to the keyboard's fixed layout (between two smashes), it's largely because of our non-random nature — a human being cannot reliably output random objects even in thought / speech. Don't ask me why (I don't think anyone knows or could prove it theoretically) but it's been verified countless times (war secrets help make such research important).
We're at best capable of pseudo-randomness mathematically. Some controversial neuroscience even places us far into the deterministic scope. A child is probably way more determined than an adult for that matter, due to a much simpler schema of reality, with 'weird obsessions' (e.g. it feels nice to smash the same place over and over again, our brain is quick to play games like that, such as walking on specific tiles to avoid the lava in the street).
I wouldn't trust most animals to output randomness. We have crypto packages suited for that purpose. ;-)
[+] [-] ignoranceprior|6 years ago|reply
https://roadtolarissa.com/oracle/
[+] [-] hcs|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] computerex|6 years ago|reply
Seems like someone is using the imagery of a cute child to make a few extra bucks, at best.
[+] [-] blotter_paper|6 years ago|reply
Joking aside, will I break this if I request too many characters? Does it loop after running out of Max's prior input? Is Max really just a script?
[+] [-] WilliamEdward|6 years ago|reply
What's likely is the kid's input was used as a seed (string to int?) and then put into a random number generator.
Kind of cute :)
[+] [-] phasetransition|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Istribitel|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Exuma|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] peteretep|6 years ago|reply
Questionable
[+] [-] NetOpWibby|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] SquishyPanda23|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lostgame|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] em-bee|6 years ago|reply
the limitation is the speed at which the human can translate that entropy into machine readable data
[+] [-] topkai22|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ghostly_s|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bdcravens|6 years ago|reply
In 2034, all the passwords will be "lol duh"
[+] [-] ggggtez|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pesfandiar|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Consultant32452|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] trpc|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wyldfire|6 years ago|reply
I have a feeling toddlers might be worse than other entropy sources.
[+] [-] code-is-code|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lukevers|6 years ago|reply
https://twitter.com/lukevers_/status/1181217729216425984 https://twitter.com/lukevers_/status/1181217968287559680