top | item 21446245 (no title) mieseratte | 6 years ago > It's well-understood by Marxists how the mode of production determines the cultural superstructure[1] (and vice-versa).It's not "understood," it's a sociological theory. Hardly hard science. discuss order hn newest zajd|6 years ago Who said anything about hard science? Just because something is well-understood by a group of people doesn't mean it has to have some sort of scientific basis to have any validity. kortilla|6 years ago Well at that point, who gives a shit? It offers no predictive capability like real models.Might as well talk about how it’s well understood by the Scientology community that it’s indicative of a required audit. load replies (1)
zajd|6 years ago Who said anything about hard science? Just because something is well-understood by a group of people doesn't mean it has to have some sort of scientific basis to have any validity. kortilla|6 years ago Well at that point, who gives a shit? It offers no predictive capability like real models.Might as well talk about how it’s well understood by the Scientology community that it’s indicative of a required audit. load replies (1)
kortilla|6 years ago Well at that point, who gives a shit? It offers no predictive capability like real models.Might as well talk about how it’s well understood by the Scientology community that it’s indicative of a required audit. load replies (1)
zajd|6 years ago
kortilla|6 years ago
Might as well talk about how it’s well understood by the Scientology community that it’s indicative of a required audit.