[grumpydba]

It's the first of its generation and is quite a failure on many aspects. It's not representative of all the nuclear reactors in France, far from it. Thus it is quite insignificant.

[epistasis]

In many ways Germany's renewable infrastructure was first of its kind, because Germany paid for the entire industry to get kickstarted.

Just like semiconductors needed ridiculously overpaid government contracts to get started at the beginning of Silicon Valley, solar needed a massive government funded effort to kick start the beginnings of the industry.

And unlike nuclear, which never got cheaper as we built more, solar is plummeting in price on a consistent schedule.

And whether or not it is a first of kind, the estimated for the FOAK build were wildly off and inaccurate, whereas with solar, Germany knew exactly the amount of financial risk they were taking by buying high.

[lispm]

> It's the first of its generation and is quite a failure on many aspects. It's not representative of all the nuclear reactors in France, far from it.

It's the only new one, based on designs of early 90s and earlier. The others are mostly all old and many with completely outdated designs from the 70s. Many wouldn't survive the crash of a larger airbus or boeing aircraft.

[Twixes]

That's the problem. Nuclear reactors are huge undertakings and obviously producing only one is going to be incredibly expensive, just like building only one wind turbine of a design. That's why countries should cooperate to build more continuously and more efficiently.

[grumpydba]

I don't judge a software on an alpha release.

[maweki]

But solar failure rate and cost will never go down?