top | item 21588686 (no title) grumpydba | 6 years ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18399389.It's been done. Performs well. discuss order hn newest rowanG077|6 years ago They quite literally were forced to use C for some parts because Go is not a systems programming language. They write this in the article. grumpydba|6 years ago > As we wanted to keep unsafe code to a minimum, we instead chose to employ the C code from the original driver as an opportunity to present cgo.It's not for performance reasons. I think you misread. Also the driver is pure go now:https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy.go load replies (1)
rowanG077|6 years ago They quite literally were forced to use C for some parts because Go is not a systems programming language. They write this in the article. grumpydba|6 years ago > As we wanted to keep unsafe code to a minimum, we instead chose to employ the C code from the original driver as an opportunity to present cgo.It's not for performance reasons. I think you misread. Also the driver is pure go now:https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy.go load replies (1)
grumpydba|6 years ago > As we wanted to keep unsafe code to a minimum, we instead chose to employ the C code from the original driver as an opportunity to present cgo.It's not for performance reasons. I think you misread. Also the driver is pure go now:https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy.go load replies (1)
rowanG077|6 years ago
grumpydba|6 years ago
It's not for performance reasons. I think you misread. Also the driver is pure go now:
https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy.go