Got Hacking? Git Hacking.
185 points| chrisbaglieri | 15 years ago |githacking.com | reply
Check us out, let us know what you think. Lots more to come.
185 points| chrisbaglieri | 15 years ago |githacking.com | reply
Check us out, let us know what you think. Lots more to come.
[+] [-] js2|15 years ago|reply
If you aren't a C coder, you can help to improve the documentation (really, just pick a man page, there are many that can use improving). Or, look at it as an opportunity to learn C -- some parts of git are quite advanced, but there's also lots of areas that are easy to work on.
See the git wiki for some areas that can use love:
https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Janitor
https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/ToDo
https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Wishlist
(Sadly the wiki is down right now, so please paste those links into google and click the cached link.)
So go on, get yourself listed on http://git-scm.com/about
:)
[+] [-] wyclif|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] russell_h|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kenneth_reitz|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chrisbaglieri|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pdelgallego|15 years ago|reply
I love the idea. A couple of months ago I created gistcube[1], It was a weekend project to learn a bit about Mongodb and Sinatra. Gistcube is a way to discover interesting gist in github. You can vote up, add to favorites, tag gists, and alos sign up to interesting/tags gist using rss.
[1] http://gistcube.com
[+] [-] Raphael|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] albertzeyer|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] btipling|15 years ago|reply
Also is the developer responsible for fixing bugs in their solution? Can a developer exploit the process by submitting buggy code they'll be paid extra to fix? Can a developer be required to fix bugs in their solution?
If a company can't inspect code before they pay they can't be certain it's relatively bug free, if they can inspect the code they could use it without paying for it easily.
[+] [-] chrisbaglieri|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] koenigdavidmj|15 years ago|reply
They could have a reputation system somewhat like that on Mechanical Turk:
* You only pay someone if you like their solution.
* People working on tasks get reputation for how well they are doing.
* People offering tasks get reputation for how many people they are paying.
[+] [-] wlk|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] codingjester|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] scalyweb|15 years ago|reply
Where is my e-mail going? What are you planning to do with it?
Also, there is no identification on who is running the project.
[+] [-] chrisbaglieri|15 years ago|reply
The emails will be used once and only once, to announce when we're open to the public.
[+] [-] mkramlich|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chrisbaglieri|15 years ago|reply
For maintainers, we're about finding developers to fill the needs of their projects. Open sourcing is step one, promoting and keeping traction can be tough. We want to arm maintainers with more to help accomplish this.
For businesses that rely on the open source code contributors and maintainers support, we want to provide a platform that they can leverage whether it's support or issue resolution. Businesses win because they get fixes, for example. Maintainers and contributors win being rewarded for their efforts.
We have several other ideas we're exploring; lot's more to come.
[+] [-] axod|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chrisbaglieri|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] OwlHuntr|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JohnnyBrown|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Bluepojo|15 years ago|reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1OhsAUMWbM
[+] [-] farnsworth|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] codingjester|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] peignoir|15 years ago|reply