top | item 21592596 (no title) grumpydba | 6 years ago > As we wanted to keep unsafe code to a minimum, we instead chose to employ the C code from the original driver as an opportunity to present cgo.It's not for performance reasons. I think you misread. Also the driver is pure go now:https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy.go discuss order hn newest rowanG077|6 years ago Systems language is not only about performance. Where did you get that? grumpydba|6 years ago They never said that they had to use c because go is not a systems language, so your assertion looks wrong. They wanted to avoid using unsafe. In c everything is unsafe by the way, so it makes it less of a systems language? load replies (1)
rowanG077|6 years ago Systems language is not only about performance. Where did you get that? grumpydba|6 years ago They never said that they had to use c because go is not a systems language, so your assertion looks wrong. They wanted to avoid using unsafe. In c everything is unsafe by the way, so it makes it less of a systems language? load replies (1)
grumpydba|6 years ago They never said that they had to use c because go is not a systems language, so your assertion looks wrong. They wanted to avoid using unsafe. In c everything is unsafe by the way, so it makes it less of a systems language? load replies (1)
rowanG077|6 years ago
grumpydba|6 years ago