(no title)
snitko | 6 years ago
Ethereum is a scam and has always been a scam from its inception. Multiple reasons for that:
1) Overly complex, obfuscating its lack of problem to solve by having lots of features and code
2) Constantly coming up with new terms and features and "new hot thing" to try and pump the price and keep the interest going.
3) No real world use case. Only promises and cryptokittes.
4) Literally controlled by one guy (see the now famous "Can you guys stop trading" quote).
5) Only produced scam ICOs with 99.99% of ICO projects practically stealing money from investors with no repercussions whatsoever.
There are many more, but the thing to remember is - Bitcoin solves a real problem: it allows people to escape and bypass existing financial system and continue doing business, save and not be subject to policies outside of their control. It is black market money which governments hate and will try to outlaw in some way. That is the real pain Bitcoin solves for people: not agreeing to unjust laws peacefully and quietly exiting the system.
seibelj|6 years ago
I agree with you about the core use case for Bitcoin currently being an escape from the government-forced financial system. It pierced the monopoly successfully. But the Ethereum screed is just lies at this point, Ethereum is one of the good ones.
jkhdigital|6 years ago
And you can't really say "Ethereum is one of the good ones" if it literally enabled the wholesale defrauding of billions of dollars from ill-informed speculators by providing the platform for those fraudulent ICOs.
snitko|6 years ago
Zamicol|6 years ago
I heard about Bitcoin in 2010 a few days before MagicalTux announced Mt. Gox on the Bitcoin forums. Once graphic card mining became a thing I quickly started a small farm while in school.
When I first understood PoW I immediately knew PoW must die for cryptocurrency to become sustainable. It is the single largest flaw with contemporary cryptocurrency. Bitcoin has become stale and unwilling to progress, instead choosing to retreat in maximalist dogma. This prevents bitcoin from solving some of these obvious technical issues. The block size debates is far more than enough to turn me away.
For me the ethereum community has been a breath of fresh air and is far more progressive than those left in the bitcoin world. After seeing the ethereum community gracefully handle the 2016 DOA hack with a hard fork, I was sold. Ethereum's community understood technology serves us, not the other way around while acknowledging and actively working toward solving problems bitcoiners often simply ignore.
I believe in the human spirit of solving problems through technology. Ethereum is not a panacea, but the ethereum project tries to remember that progressive spirit.
lostmsu|6 years ago
1. Both are very complex. How did you compare?
2. "Constantly coming up with new terms and features and "new hot thing"" - this is a fact. "to try and pump the price" - this is a speculation. Even if it is not - I don't know why is it necessarily bad. That is one of the major goals of every company applying to YC, or doing any kind of innovation in business.
3. Technically, all the use cases for Bitcoin are the same as the use cases for Ethereum, AFAIK.
4. It has the same proof of work system with miners, so in the end Buterin has the same 0 direct control over it, as Nakamoto would over Bitcoin. True, a lot of influence.
5. "97.3% of all statistics are made up."
chx|6 years ago
Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2107770
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21145147
snitko|6 years ago
nootropicat|6 years ago
https://trade.dydx.exchange/markets
https://app.compound.finance/
>Bitcoin solves a real problem: it allows people to escape and bypass existing financial system and continue doing business, save and not be subject to policies outside of their control. It is black market money which governments hate and will try to outlaw in some way.
Bitcoin completely failed, as majority of its hashpower is located in China. The Chinese government can tell miners to censor transactions tomorrow and to orphan blocks from non-compliant miners and it would happen. There's no defense against this. Changing PoW via a hard fork would result in a gpu-secured network that's even more vulnerable than an asic-based one, as it's easier to a large entity to rent or buy enough gpus.
PoS is the only defense against such centralization. Most hashpower is going to be an impossible to hide industrial facilities, while PoS only needs an internet connection, much harder to catch. More importantly, even if a determined attacker acquires a very big fraction of the tokens and attacks the network, a hard fork can just delete the hostile accounts. One a gpu based PoW network is attacked there's no solution, as it's not possible to make the attacker's mining hardware ineffective via a hard fork.
godzillabrennus|6 years ago
Bitcoin is slow.
There are better alternatives out there.
jl2718|6 years ago
Other than that (fatal problem), its a great technical project.
Proven|6 years ago
[deleted]
Temasik|6 years ago
[deleted]