(no title)
RubenSandwich | 6 years ago
Sulfur Lamp: 100 lumens per watt. [0]
Random LED Light bulb: 88.888 lumens per watt. [1]
~20% improvement.
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20030818061414/http://195.178.16...
[1] https://www.amazon.com/TCP-Equivalent-Light-Bulbs-Non-Dimmab...
VLM|6 years ago
The real competitor of these "ten kilowatt" class bulbs is theater-type arc lamp type devices where you can't deal with the weird spectral effects of LEDs and other quantum mechanical goofiness... Today you can buy COTS xenon lamps that run around 40 or so watts/lumen, so 100 L/W is a nice upgrade for stage and film theaters.
I don't know what sportsball stadiums use for night games. For raw bulk ugly illumination, sodium discharge lamps are COTS around 150 or so L/W, far surpassing what the sulfur bulbs can do in the lab. Interesting thought experiment is immense capex was dropped to illuminate sportsball fields and replacing the lights makes half the demand go away... so are sportsball fields going to be twice as bright at night or recycle all that power company infrastructure or is legacy pro sportsball going away with the boomers before sulfur bulbs could arrive commercially or ?
I don't see an easy way to decouple the magnetron and stuff from the lamp for sale purposes. A kilowatt class xenon lamp runs over a hundred dollars and figure a kilowatt class microwave oven and its innards could double the cost of a sulfur lamp while halving the cost of the electricity... this is really bad news for theater goers... it'll make theaters even more capital intensive which means even more risk adverse. If you're tired of formulaic remakes now, imagine when financial risk is twice as high due to double the bulb cost, LOL.
d33|6 years ago
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/a/360167/16009
amluto|6 years ago
I’m familiar with two kinds of high-power theatrical lighting: tungsten and discharge. Tungsten is inefficient and has poor power factor when dimmed. Discharge lamps can’t cycle quickly, so, as a practical matter, they are turned in well before a show starts (to make sure they all work!) and stay on, at full power, until after the show. A motorized shutter modulates the light output. This wasted tons of power when the shutter is closed.
LEDs can cycle essentially arbitrarily quickly, and a good driver gets a power factor near 1.
I think it would be interesting to design a theater lighting system with a DC bus. Tungsten lights (where needed) would be driven by PWM, and LEDs would be driven directly by PWM if the voltages matched or with a DC-DC converter otherwise. There would be a battery to even out the load to minimize demand charges.
I don’t know what a three-phase AC-to-DC converter rated for, say, 100kW would cost. You’d want one that can be controlled such that it can share load in a controlled manner with a battery on the DC side.
IndrekR|6 years ago
Sulfur lamps have CRI < 80. High CRI (> 90) LEDs are real competitors to HID lamps here.
baybal2|6 years ago
LEDs are cheaper, and, more importantly, already there.
emmelaich|6 years ago
Good for low light pollution too.
Popular in Australia; are they popular elsewhere?
jessriedel|6 years ago
namibj|6 years ago
unknown|6 years ago
[deleted]
NiekvdMaas|6 years ago