Doesn’t seem like a good bet for the long term. There’s no practical reason why modifying the DOM couldn’t be practically free. Especially if we can hint to the layout engine that we’re working in a well behaved subset. (Or the layout engine can detect such)
Hi, I work on a browser, layout and styling are expensive.
Browsers already to tons of work to avoid recomputing too much of this stuff whenever the DOM changes, and it's still inadvisable to poke the DOM too much. I don't see this changing anytime soon. There are various new features that allow for some level of hinting, but it's not going to obviate this. Browsers need to have incremental layout/styling prepare for any kind of potential change, whereas if you have a reactive UI framework you know what kinds of changes can happen, and can optimize diffing based on that.
There's a reason why a lot of JS UI frameworks use a virtual DOM. It sounds expensive to maintain, but directly operating on the DOM is more expensive.
erikpukinskis|6 years ago
Manishearth|6 years ago
Browsers already to tons of work to avoid recomputing too much of this stuff whenever the DOM changes, and it's still inadvisable to poke the DOM too much. I don't see this changing anytime soon. There are various new features that allow for some level of hinting, but it's not going to obviate this. Browsers need to have incremental layout/styling prepare for any kind of potential change, whereas if you have a reactive UI framework you know what kinds of changes can happen, and can optimize diffing based on that.
There's a reason why a lot of JS UI frameworks use a virtual DOM. It sounds expensive to maintain, but directly operating on the DOM is more expensive.
aassddffasdf|6 years ago
outworlder|6 years ago
Oh yeah, modifying the DOM is practically free. Which is why React and the like do that in their mirror DOM.
Actually applying the resulting changes, on the other hand...