If you read the article, it’s talking about not putting in a backdoor, and not Facebook saying “we have access to all encrypted messages, we’re just not giving them to you”. As it stands, they’re end-to-end encrypted so not even Facebook can’t see your messages, and that’s what Barr doesn’t like
tantalor|6 years ago
Not quite. Facebook still controls the endpoints, so when you see the message so can they. This is obvious: you use their app to view the encrypted message, hence the app has access to the cleartext.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endpoint_security
fooker|6 years ago
If the app is not phoning home with the cleartext, this seems okay. You need some software to retrieve/read text anyway, so this becomes an exercise about trusting trust, etc.
Bartweiss|6 years ago
In order to actually provide your messages to Facebook, the app needs to either call home when you view the message or write the cleartext somewhere on-device to send home later. If you view the message and then the app calls out with data we can't inspect, or writes something locally that we can't inspect, it could potentially be exfiltrating the message you viewed. If not... am I missing an attack vector, or is that message safe?
(To be precise: this would only prove forward secrecy, meaning safety for that viewing of that message. If we can't see the app's code, it could have testbench cutouts like Volkswagen or WannaCry, or more likely could only trigger for certain users or in certain cases à la Greyball.)
plicense|6 years ago
jb775|6 years ago
I'm sure realistically the US gov could creatively accomplish what they want.
SilasX|6 years ago
excalibur|6 years ago
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2019/05/05/faceboo...
nighthawk24|6 years ago
bytematic|6 years ago
likpok|6 years ago