top | item 21802827

Driver 'blows up' car with 'excessive' use of air freshener

38 points| sohkamyung | 6 years ago |bbc.com | reply

41 comments

order
[+] adamcharnock|6 years ago|reply
Me and my friends had a lot of fun as teenagers using aerosols for a similar purpose. We'd scavenge old aerosols from our parent's houses and use them as the propellant for spud guns and the like (we didn't blow up any cars, for the record).

I think the trick was to find the ones with propane propellant rather than butane. I also suspect that the (rapidly boiled) moisture droplets from the aerosol would have added to the explosive force too.

Eventually we decided to go straight to the source and got ourselves a little oxy/propane welding kit. That worked a treat. I'm kind of surprised B&Q sold that to a bunch a teenagers actually.

[+] zeroflow|6 years ago|reply
Am I the only one thinking that this was no "excessive air freshener use" but more like someone huffing flammable gasses?
[+] dsfyu404ed|6 years ago|reply
The fuel:air ratio for getting high is way richer than the fuel:air ratio for combustion. Also if you're getting high off it you're probably not going to want to waste it. I'm assuming butane was the propellant for the air freshener since IIRC that's a common propellant for things that are supposed to smell nice.

https://www.mathesongas.com/pdfs/products/Lower-(LEL)-&-Uppe...

[+] airbreather|6 years ago|reply
Many things hit an explosive atmosphere at around 4%.

Also, there is the concept of deflagration vs detonation, the latter being decidedly worse, but unlikely in this case due to the geometry.

There is a whole field of electrical engineering dedicated to defining potential for and avoiding of igniting explosive atmospheres in industrial plant.

[+] shakna|6 years ago|reply
Achieving the right fuel/air mixture before the lighter ignites it requires so many things to go right (or wrong) that this might be one of those things tossed around by conspiracy theorists for a long time.

Probably significantly helped by the improvement of door seals over the years.

[+] justin66|6 years ago|reply
A very strange use of scare quotes by the BBC.

The guy blew up his car with an excessive use of air freshener. "Blow up" isn't a precise technical term we need to worry about abusing. "Excessive" might be subjective or subject to debate, but when the resulting damage is enough to blow out the windows and bend the sheet metal, let's just go with excessive.

[+] davefp|6 years ago|reply
Those aren't scare quotes, they're just regular quotes. Here I assume they're taken from the police statement on the incident.

Edit to add quote in context:

> West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service said the cause of the "dramatic" incident was "excessive" air freshener use.

[+] kilo_bravo_3|6 years ago|reply
Those aren't scare quotes.

They're quote quotes.

The BBC follows a journalistic style guide that requires the use of quotes when directly quoting someone else when the attribution is not clear.

That makes it easier to determine, when reading an article, if the substance of an article is based on a journalist's own research and observations or those of another.

It is actually the right way to do things.

BBC News style guide: https://www.bbc.co.uk/academy/en/articles/art201307021121335...

[+] pcx|6 years ago|reply
On a related note, a lot of folks feel air fresheners actually make the air fresh. Don't they usually just hide the smell?
[+] 0xBA5ED|6 years ago|reply
Easy brain hack. Name your thing what you want people to think it does.
[+] bovermyer|6 years ago|reply
Correct.

Unless they're based on whatever chemical combination makes Febreeze work, in which case it does actually eliminate odor. There's a fascinating story behind the invention of Febreeze.

[+] peterwwillis|6 years ago|reply
Hiding a smell is air freshening. If you're thinking of purifying, that's a separate thing.
[+] janpot|6 years ago|reply
Why would you use an air freshener if you're gonna smoke in it anyway?
[+] zamadatix|6 years ago|reply
Smokers tend to not notice the smell of smoke since they are constantly around it/smell of it themselves.
[+] Reason077|6 years ago|reply
Seems to happen pretty regularly! The “More on this story” links below the article list two other similar incidents, in November 2019 and September 2017.
[+] gwbas1c|6 years ago|reply
I personally find this story a little hard to believe.

Anyone able to explain this in a bit more detail?

Naively, I wonder if the driver may have had other flammable substances present?

[+] notjtrig|6 years ago|reply
A quick spray in a potato cannon has the explosive energy to propel a potato, it’s not unreasonable to think a the entire can can blow up a car.

https://youtu.be/fioP8cflUIA Hairspray can in bonfire

[+] Reason077|6 years ago|reply
Excessive air freshener use can’t be healthy even if it doesn’t “blow up”. Inhaling all that propellant and volatile compounds.
[+] dundercoder|6 years ago|reply
How much pressure are we talking here to blow a windscreen? Enough to rupture an eardrum?
[+] flareback|6 years ago|reply
I wonder what really happened that he came up with that story to tell the cops? I'm not sure I'm going to believe this story until we have Adam Savage show it's possible.
[+] snazz|6 years ago|reply
Adam Savage already blew stuff up with spray sunscreen (for the same reason—propane as a propellant). The hard part is getting the stoichiometry right so it explodes instead of just burning.
[+] ThrowawayR2|6 years ago|reply
Vaporized fuel + air explosions is essentially what occurs in the cylinders of a gasoline engine of an automobile; there's nothing mysterious about this.
[+] blattimwind|6 years ago|reply
Never experimented with potato cannonry?