(no title)
bcmo
|
6 years ago
I like thought experiments like this. Sort of along these lines, I've been wondering more why we don't make displays that just connect to a cloud hosted VM instead of PC's -- the end user never has to know what or where is powering the images in front of them. Assuming its just network bandwidth issues preventing this, but eventually this could make more sense than having an actual machine in your home. Would be a lot cheaper, there would be hosting economies of scale, etc.
cattlemansgold|6 years ago
sliken|6 years ago
You can even run Android apps, or linux native apps under chrome://settings.
You can edit that spreadsheet locally, just click on offline editing.
Sure when you click save it saves to the cloud, but that's about the largest difference between Chrome OS and Linux, they are running the same kernel after all.
bcmo|6 years ago
stevewodil|6 years ago
There are however many desktop as a service providers in existence that effectively host desktops in the cloud and allow users to connect to those desktops from a thin client or their PC.
bcmo|6 years ago
I think as years go on the network access issue becomes less and less of a problem though. Plus, for home dekstop computers there is pretty much constant access.
x122278181|6 years ago
[deleted]