Isn't all of the global art marketplace, a swindle to begin with? It's a money laundering industry in its entirely with almost barely any money actually reaching the original artist. It could have easily been him selling something he drew up in 2 days, make up a bullshit backstory, sell it for 50 million and he'd actually not have to disappear
I repeatedly see a cynicism around art on HN and other tech blogs, does no-one here see the inherent value in art or culture?
Jackson Pollock's art pieces get a lot of flack for basically having no publicly presented interpretive structure, the artist came up with a technique for doing 'plastic depth' that was a novel innovation. Irvine Kershner who directed Empire Strikes Back and met Pollock made fun of him at the time for his work appearing to be off the rails, and later came to appreciate it.
Taking out the market manipulation of fine art still leaves it with an intrinsic value whether it is technique or the meaning imbued in having a piece of work produced by an artist. Is that worth millions? Who knows, if I give you any old guitar, and a guitar that Elvis played on I know the second will be valued higher.
> I think the reason he felt safe in taking part in the documentary is because he is in a country where he is beyond the reach of U.S. law enforcement.
>And yet he doesn't have money ... so there's no point in anyone coming after him because a civil suit wouldn't get them any money at all, and the FBI can't get him because he's out of their reach.
Title conflicts with the statements in the article. Though IMO, there's probably good reason to wonder if this claim is true.
> There is a certain point in the film where there's a little flicker of remorse, but more than anything he feels that his actions were in some way justifiable.
One of my relatives is like that. :(
She'll lie, cheat, steal and generally screw over people. But pretend innocence to the outside world, and come up with truly bizarre reasons to justify things when asked by people who've realised what she's doing.
Taiwan and North Korea are the only two countries I've found that seem to have no extradition and no (formal) interface to law enforcement abroad through Interpol.
Palau, Tuvalu and Micronesia in the Pacific are not members of Interpol, but they do have extradition treaties with the US, and then there are a host of countries in Interpol that have no US extradition.
[+] [-] eddhead|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] milofeynman|6 years ago|reply
[0] https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2018/02/09/584555705/epis...
[+] [-] friendlybus|6 years ago|reply
Jackson Pollock's art pieces get a lot of flack for basically having no publicly presented interpretive structure, the artist came up with a technique for doing 'plastic depth' that was a novel innovation. Irvine Kershner who directed Empire Strikes Back and met Pollock made fun of him at the time for his work appearing to be off the rails, and later came to appreciate it.
Taking out the market manipulation of fine art still leaves it with an intrinsic value whether it is technique or the meaning imbued in having a piece of work produced by an artist. Is that worth millions? Who knows, if I give you any old guitar, and a guitar that Elvis played on I know the second will be valued higher.
[+] [-] saagarjha|6 years ago|reply
Considering the original artist is often deceased, I think it would be rather difficult for them to get the money.
[+] [-] redis_mlc|6 years ago|reply
According to press reports, most artworks for sale are forged.
(The corollary is that old collections are even more valuable.)
[+] [-] t_akosuke|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] gjs278|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] Enginerrrd|6 years ago|reply
>And yet he doesn't have money ... so there's no point in anyone coming after him because a civil suit wouldn't get them any money at all, and the FBI can't get him because he's out of their reach.
Title conflicts with the statements in the article. Though IMO, there's probably good reason to wonder if this claim is true.
[+] [-] justinclift|6 years ago|reply
One of my relatives is like that. :(
She'll lie, cheat, steal and generally screw over people. But pretend innocence to the outside world, and come up with truly bizarre reasons to justify things when asked by people who've realised what she's doing.
It's unfortunate, as it's so destructive. :(
[+] [-] fnord77|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unstrafed|6 years ago|reply
Palau, Tuvalu and Micronesia in the Pacific are not members of Interpol, but they do have extradition treaties with the US, and then there are a host of countries in Interpol that have no US extradition.
[+] [-] mushufasa|6 years ago|reply
somehow, though, I don't believe they're in North Korea? Nor that the documentary filmmaker could get there...
[+] [-] sailfast|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] findyoucef|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dmolony|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] findyoucef|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eeh|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kristofferR|6 years ago|reply
It's so damn dumb to force people to seek pirate sources by not providing legal options.
[+] [-] abstrct|6 years ago|reply