"This is a big moment in solar physics," says Vourlidas. "STEREO has revealed the sun as it really is--a sphere of hot plasma and intricately woven magnetic fields."
Is it just me, or does that sound suspiciously like it is from an Onion article? I mean, it's very cool (and presumably useful) to have a full-time 360 view of the sun. But I'm pretty sure the idea the sun is a sphere of hot plasma is not startlingly new information...
The point is, for the first time in human history, we can see by direct observation that the sun is in fact a sphere. It's not huge in the sense that "We were right!", but rather that wow... now we can actually see it!
You do not really want the raw data (it generally looks something like this[1], from the COR telescope, "FITS" format[2]. Warning: mix of ascii and binary). Anyway, this[3] links to where they are putting the raw and first-order-derived mission data they have released so far (if you want more of what you saw, you probably want SECCHI). And here[4] is an example of said derived data. And this[5] seems to be where they seem to be putting highlighted derived products for public outreach.
Generally, there is very little money and little expertise for polished public outreach efforts (they are scientists, not web developers, after all). There is a good chance the scientists behind [3] are doing some of it in their "spare" time. Feel free to drop them an email and let them know it is appreciated :)
Don't vote him down, that's a valid point. Much NASA data is made public, but it might not be linked from this particular site. I would recommend looking around and seeing if you can't find it.
Am I the only one who sees this and wonders why there's such a large discrepancy between the right and left halves? Were they taken days / weeks / months apart or something? It kind of defeats the point of "stereo" to do so.
Specifically, why is that white splotch in such a radically different location (remember, diameter of the sun as Google states it is 1,391,000 km, that's gotta be near 100,000 km difference).
I read this article this morning. I wonder why they didn't launch one satellite into Orbit A, wait 6 months[1], then launch the second satellite into Orbit A, but from the other side of the sun. Then, once they maneuvered into position, we'd have satellites stationed on both sides permanently.
It seems like that would be a lot faster, and would also ensure we can maintain our full view of the sun for a long period of time.
[1]Or however long it would take to get to the opposite side of the sun, accounting for the first satellite's movements.
The stereos aren't staying in place, they start in the same orbit as Earth (and thus, with the same orbital speed). So we need to gently speed them up and slow them down. It would be inefficient to have the first probe burn a lot of fuel to stop, burn some fuel so it won't get pulled into the sun, and then 6 months later burn some fuel to resume orbit.
[+] [-] colomon|15 years ago|reply
Is it just me, or does that sound suspiciously like it is from an Onion article? I mean, it's very cool (and presumably useful) to have a full-time 360 view of the sun. But I'm pretty sure the idea the sun is a sphere of hot plasma is not startlingly new information...
[+] [-] mcantor|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tialys|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bellaire|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dotBen|15 years ago|reply
I wish NASA would release versions in whatever the native dimensions/resolutions they are receiving the image data back in.
[+] [-] novas0x2a|15 years ago|reply
Generally, there is very little money and little expertise for polished public outreach efforts (they are scientists, not web developers, after all). There is a good chance the scientists behind [3] are doing some of it in their "spare" time. Feel free to drop them an email and let them know it is appreciated :)
1) http://sharpp.nrl.navy.mil//postflight/lz/L0/a/seq/cor1/2011...
2) http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/
3) http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/data.shtml
4) http://cdaw.gsfc.nasa.gov/movie/make_javamovie.php?img1=stb_...)
5) http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/gallery.shtml
[+] [-] unknown|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] geuis|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JohnnyBrown|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stettberger|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Groxx|15 years ago|reply
Specifically, why is that white splotch in such a radically different location (remember, diameter of the sun as Google states it is 1,391,000 km, that's gotta be near 100,000 km difference).
[+] [-] zacharycohn|15 years ago|reply
It seems like that would be a lot faster, and would also ensure we can maintain our full view of the sun for a long period of time.
[1]Or however long it would take to get to the opposite side of the sun, accounting for the first satellite's movements.
[+] [-] civilian|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Joakal|15 years ago|reply
Next: Dyson sphere itself?
[+] [-] ajray|15 years ago|reply