Now drop in some version control (mercurial for my own preference :)) and we are onto a winner.
Dropbox is great for syncing between your development machines, but version control is essential for deployment and team development. Combining the two is really powerful.
Another "feature" would be the ability to use it without dropbox--save functionality removed. I don't have my dropbox password handy, so the app is completely unusable. (HTML"5" database/ javascript localstorage?)
This is fantastic. This is exactly how I foresee the future documents and editing. Dropbox, or something like that, provides the service of saving the files. Then web apps are granted access to them and can edit them. Local storage becomes a cache, and Dropbox is where the files are "really" stored.
The advantage of this, of course, is that all your stuff becomes device-independent. Log in from any device that has web access, and you'll have access to all your apps and all your files.
This is much better than having each web app manage files on their own. For instance, you might have documents saved in Google Docs, notes saved in Evernote and Catch.com, and emails saved somewhere else, etc. It sure would be nice to have a single service provide the file storage so that you always have all your stuff and don't have to worry about some web app going obsolete and losing your data along with it.
Now what I would really like for backwards-compatibility is a web-based Linux environment to access my files. Someone recently created a web app using the HTML 5 canvas element (I think) to run an X GUI. (Anyone remember what this was called and where it is located?) Attach a Linux system and that GUI technology to your Dropbox, and then you have an entire computer that can be accessed from any device. Either the browser itself would load all the files and run them by emulation, or a server could run them natively and just print the results to your browser. Either way, once that becomes possible, I would be able to convert to an all-web environment.
Little things like icons on the left are really helpful when trying to browse a file structure. In any case, I'll likely be using this once and a while in a pinch since I keep all of my client files in Dropbox.
I'm also excited for the Ace update. This appears to be using a pretty old version. Rendering text in the DOM is much faster.
It looks like both of us are hitting something here. People seem to be VERY enthusiastic about this. I am very excited to have pieced together some amazing technologies.
Joel, I actually saw your app and thought that it was quite amazing looking (it gave me hope in Ace actually!)
I hate being negative, but I really don't see the use case. I have a text editor and Dropbox installed on my machine, why would I want to install this editor?
In the context of something like Chrome OS, stuff like this is vital to being able to do meaningful development work. It's also pretty cool to have your personal development environment, settings, etc. immediately accessible from wherever you may be.
I only wish the real Textmate followed up on the huge list of todo's and feature requests people have been submitting. I think a core update is long overdue.
This is very interesting. I realize I'm in the minority here, but I would love to use something like this for editing English-language text such as articles, letters, and so forth. This requires decent support for line-wrapping, proportional fonts, and configurable line-spacing. I write my documents in markdown and convert it to whatever is needed - ODT or LaTeX - using the fantastic pandoc. I don't actually write a lot of code; I do write a lot of articles.
I also really like vim keybindings, which makes my usecase even more exotic. Web apps might make this niche interesting.
Nice find. Since this is a text editor, it would be nice to just display text files.
PlainText, my favorite iOS app for note-taking, displays all files from a specific folder within Dropbox. It may be limiting to others, having just have one folder but it keeps things organized. I'd like to see this either support that one folder model or alternatively, hide all content (images/video etc) that don't apply to the editor.
I'm angry at myself for not thinking about the Dropbox portion of the application. I had already thought that a TextMate-like editor for Chrome would be really nice to have, but I couldn't think of a solution for. If I used traditional saving methods, I couldn't figure out why I wouldn't just use emacs, coda, textmate, etc. The Dropbox portion is what makes this app for me.
I'm behind a corporate firewall where Chrome isn't allowed, any-one know of an equivalent which will run on Firefox?
As an aside the Chrome Web Store tantalizingly says "Sorry, we don't support your browser just yet. You'll need Google Chrome to install apps, extensions and themes."- are they planning to go cross-browser at some point or just teasing me?
It looks handy, but upon realizing that it doesn't actually do very much (beyond simple text editing), I discovered http://kodingen.com (has a Chrome app, but really it just sends you to their website). It looks pretty amazing and fully featured so far.
Speaking of DropBox integration: I have the DropBox App on my iPhone, and the 1Password App too, which has "DropBox integration", but it asks for my DropBox password. Is that the way it's supposed to work? Shouldn't 1Password be able to access DropBox files via the phone itself?
I believe 1Password is just using the Dropbox API, in which case your credentials are indeed needed. I don't think it's possible for 1Password to use the Dropbox App to do the integration with the Dropbox service, at least not at the present time with the way apps are sandboxed.
[+] [-] stevejohnson|15 years ago|reply
That said, this looks quite convenient, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention!
[+] [-] ErrantX|15 years ago|reply
Now drop in some version control (mercurial for my own preference :)) and we are onto a winner.
Dropbox is great for syncing between your development machines, but version control is essential for deployment and team development. Combining the two is really powerful.
[+] [-] rbxbx|15 years ago|reply
Pretty good way to get people unfamiliar with version control to see the utility of it, though :)
[+] [-] sudont|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] BerislavLopac|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] davej|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] patrickk|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JulianMorrison|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yafujifide|15 years ago|reply
The advantage of this, of course, is that all your stuff becomes device-independent. Log in from any device that has web access, and you'll have access to all your apps and all your files.
This is much better than having each web app manage files on their own. For instance, you might have documents saved in Google Docs, notes saved in Evernote and Catch.com, and emails saved somewhere else, etc. It sure would be nice to have a single service provide the file storage so that you always have all your stuff and don't have to worry about some web app going obsolete and losing your data along with it.
Now what I would really like for backwards-compatibility is a web-based Linux environment to access my files. Someone recently created a web app using the HTML 5 canvas element (I think) to run an X GUI. (Anyone remember what this was called and where it is located?) Attach a Linux system and that GUI technology to your Dropbox, and then you have an entire computer that can be accessed from any device. Either the browser itself would load all the files and run them by emulation, or a server could run them natively and just print the results to your browser. Either way, once that becomes possible, I would be able to convert to an all-web environment.
[+] [-] zoomzoom|15 years ago|reply
http://www.catonmat.net/blog/i-am-doing-a-startup.
[+] [-] joshuarr|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] auston|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] abp|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] heffay|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JoelSutherland|15 years ago|reply
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gethifi/4952045778/
Little things like icons on the left are really helpful when trying to browse a file structure. In any case, I'll likely be using this once and a while in a pinch since I keep all of my client files in Dropbox.
I'm also excited for the Ace update. This appears to be using a pretty old version. Rendering text in the DOM is much faster.
[+] [-] kenneth_chau|15 years ago|reply
Joel, I actually saw your app and thought that it was quite amazing looking (it gave me hope in Ace actually!)
[+] [-] jroes|15 years ago|reply
This is probably best as a web app, not a browser plugin.
[+] [-] mkilling|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DanI-S|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kristiandupont|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] berberich|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DanI-S|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mattmillr|15 years ago|reply
Two suggestions: (1) Word-wrap. (2) Let me pick a dark-on-light color scheme.
[+] [-] ffffruit|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] askar|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Timmy_C|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] netghost|15 years ago|reply
http://endofline.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/3-browser-based-ed...
[+] [-] loevborg|15 years ago|reply
I also really like vim keybindings, which makes my usecase even more exotic. Web apps might make this niche interesting.
[+] [-] kenneth_chau|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] navs|15 years ago|reply
PlainText, my favorite iOS app for note-taking, displays all files from a specific folder within Dropbox. It may be limiting to others, having just have one folder but it keeps things organized. I'd like to see this either support that one folder model or alternatively, hide all content (images/video etc) that don't apply to the editor.
[+] [-] 27182818284|15 years ago|reply
That
[+] [-] kscaldef|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] murrayb|15 years ago|reply
As an aside the Chrome Web Store tantalizingly says "Sorry, we don't support your browser just yet. You'll need Google Chrome to install apps, extensions and themes."- are they planning to go cross-browser at some point or just teasing me?
[+] [-] quinndupont|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] euroclydon|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] YooLi|15 years ago|reply