To be honest, I don't really understand this meme of investors on twitter being universally bad or something one would want to mute out.
A well known investor on twitter actually did the 'follow, wait for follow back, then after some time unfollow' thing on me recently. When people do this, as a rule I unfollow them again when I notice, but for this person I actually didn't because they genuinely tweet interesting and useful things that I appreciate having in my feed!
They're not all bad, far from it. But sometimes a few actors poisons the well of a whole label (ehm, shark tank), causing some people to have an allergic reaction to the whole class (even if it isn't true that all of them are bad).
Showing some example of particularly egregious thought leadership and maybe an animation of it being silenced would go a long way towards helping. I blocked twitter.com in a hosts file, so I can't see if it embeds any tweets.
It would be nice if it mentioned how it works as well as who it will be affecting.
Is it unfollowing these people, is it muting them, etc?
Clicking "continue with twitter" asks for a lot of stuff including "Mute, block, and report accounts for you.", "Follow and unfollow accounts for you.", and "Post and delete Tweets for you".
Once you log in, you can see a bunch of accounts and either mute/unmute one-by-one or in bulk.
Twitter doesn’t give very many options for developers (read, read/write, read/write/dms). So unfortunately in order to POST to /mutes, the app gets access to more than it needs.
Ryan Hoover is generally pretty innocuous and is also the founder of ProductHunt, something builders might want to hear about. And ShrugCap pretty much just makes fun of SV VC.
Maybe it has something to do with how Twitter will suggest tweets to you that meet their algorithms' threshold for popularity when the account that tweeted them is simply one that the people you follow also happened to follow.
Plus I think there are socially left-leaning people in tech who want nothing to do with anything distinctly related to capitalism, and so ousting investors from their circles is seen as "good praxis" or whatever they call it.
It's a javascript program. It's not going to be blazing fast by any reasonable definition. Ironic that a program designed to filter out Silicon Valley bullshit has succumbed to Silicon Valley bullshit.
[+] [-] davnicwil|6 years ago|reply
A well known investor on twitter actually did the 'follow, wait for follow back, then after some time unfollow' thing on me recently. When people do this, as a rule I unfollow them again when I notice, but for this person I actually didn't because they genuinely tweet interesting and useful things that I appreciate having in my feed!
[+] [-] tw1010|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] fitpolar|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] coolswan|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] g82918|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] smegma2|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] geoah|6 years ago|reply
Is it unfollowing these people, is it muting them, etc?
Clicking "continue with twitter" asks for a lot of stuff including "Mute, block, and report accounts for you.", "Follow and unfollow accounts for you.", and "Post and delete Tweets for you".
[+] [-] meagher|6 years ago|reply
Once you log in, you can see a bunch of accounts and either mute/unmute one-by-one or in bulk.
Twitter doesn’t give very many options for developers (read, read/write, read/write/dms). So unfortunately in order to POST to /mutes, the app gets access to more than it needs.
[+] [-] geoah|6 years ago|reply
https://github.com/tmm/mute.vc/tree/master/.github/screensho...
[+] [-] kohtatsu|6 years ago|reply
Wait, what kind of use-case is there for this?
[+] [-] juped|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] coolswan|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tw1010|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] draw_down|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] ErikAugust|6 years ago|reply
The Twitter list you use is configurable.
My one thought is you could probably move the usernames over to a file you could version control with the idea of accepting PRs.
[+] [-] meagher|6 years ago|reply
Great idea - thought about doing it, but was out of scope for a holiday hack because of Twitter’s rate limiting.
[+] [-] krtbgb|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] giancarlostoro|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] meagher|6 years ago|reply
was a gimmicky hack i threw together over the holiday so i could turn on/off vc twitter easily.
[+] [-] geoah|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] css|6 years ago|reply
[0] https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/a/2015/sharing-block-lists-to...
[+] [-] meagher|6 years ago|reply
blocking is more extreme - neither user can view each other's content (says you are blocked by @username).
[+] [-] madamelic|6 years ago|reply
Ryan Hoover is generally pretty innocuous and is also the founder of ProductHunt, something builders might want to hear about. And ShrugCap pretty much just makes fun of SV VC.
[+] [-] WarOnPrivacy|6 years ago|reply
After that, a Promoted Tweet muter would find wide appreciation (using uBO for that now).
[+] [-] dataisfun|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] omarhaneef|6 years ago|reply
If I didn't want to hear from someone, wouldn't I not follow them in the first place?
What is the use case here?
[+] [-] 1MachineElf|6 years ago|reply
Plus I think there are socially left-leaning people in tech who want nothing to do with anything distinctly related to capitalism, and so ousting investors from their circles is seen as "good praxis" or whatever they call it.
[+] [-] meagher|6 years ago|reply
overall, this was a little hack that everyone i talked to thought was funny.
[+] [-] danalec|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] abalashov|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DC-3|6 years ago|reply
It's a javascript program. It's not going to be blazing fast by any reasonable definition. Ironic that a program designed to filter out Silicon Valley bullshit has succumbed to Silicon Valley bullshit.
[+] [-] parhamn|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] connor4312|6 years ago|reply
I think bashing on software built with JavaScript is far more "Silicon Valley bullshit" than the act of writing it :)
[+] [-] stestagg|6 years ago|reply