top | item 2207138

37signals support satisfaction ratings now public

82 points| wlll | 15 years ago |37signals.com | reply

27 comments

order
[+] fredoliveira|15 years ago|reply
I have to give it to these guys (I work on a competitor product). Even though this is a simple idea and possibly something of trivial implementation, it's clear, honest, and just plain nice. My hat is off to them for keeping their customers happy - very well done.
[+] sudonim|15 years ago|reply
The subtle dig at getsatisfaction was interesting. (For history: http://37signals.com/svn/posts/1650-get-satisfaction-or-else ).

This is a good show of selective transparency. The last 100 should serve to make potential customers feel warm and fuzzy without actually showing anything to potentially discourage them (other than if the last 100 were :( complaints)).

[+] jasonfried|15 years ago|reply
For the record, it's not a subtle dig at getsatisfaction. "Customer satisfaction" has been a term used by the companies for decades. We don't think satisfaction is a very high bar. We're fighting against low expectations.
[+] tptacek|15 years ago|reply
I don't understand this observation. The alternative would be to show, what, a paginated array of every face? Who would benefit from that, besides people who want to snipe at them anonymously on message boards?

Incidentally, in real companies, all transparency is selective. They've selected not to be transparent about any number of things, from their monthly top-line revenue to their feature roadmap.

[+] proexploit|15 years ago|reply
I think GetSatisfaction did a great job responding to this post at the time and it's important to give them some credit for a good response to criticism.
[+] allwein|15 years ago|reply
I wish that I could click on the individual smiley faces and find out the facts of the statuses. For some reason it's driving me nuts that I don't know why the frowny faces are unhappy.
[+] jasonfried|15 years ago|reply
We have access to that, but we can't share it since the comments often include confidential information.

The biggest source of unhappiness is when we can't deliver a feature request immediately.

[+] sammcd|15 years ago|reply
From what i can tell it looks like the satisfaction rate has declined since this went live. I wonder if the fact that this is public info has changed the responses some how.
[+] xbryanx|15 years ago|reply
Gah! Their support email example uses two! exclamation marks! I'd! be torn as to whether to give them a grimace or a frown on that point alone!!
[+] marcamillion|15 years ago|reply
Hrmm...not to be disgusting, but you would take a live example of a company doing right by their customers to rain on their parade because they used two exclamation marks instead of one?

sigh Sometimes people can make mountains out of molehills.

[+] j_baker|15 years ago|reply
Bear in mind that I say this as one of the biggest grammar nazis I know: Who the fuck cares?
[+] cfontes|15 years ago|reply
This is a company I would definitely would like to work. Always innovating and with some very nice products.
[+] joelrunyon|15 years ago|reply
How long till people start gaming this & submitting bad customer support tickets, just to spite them?
[+] brianpan|15 years ago|reply
I don't see the point of getting a frowny face on a website for fun. But the point is, if you're not happy then putting a frown is exactly what you should do to let them know you weren't happy. Out of spite or whatever other reason, the point of customer support is trying to make those people happy customers.