top | item 22085022 (no title) mflamespin | 6 years ago Source? discuss order hn newest cultus|6 years ago From the former director of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network.https://www.washington.edu/boundless/earthquake-authority/ hyperpape|6 years ago While that's a useful counterpoint, it doesn't really provide an estimate of the damage that could be done.I'm thinking of questions like: 1. Are there areas where people currently live that shouldn't be inhabited? 2. What's the worst case death toll?I realize there's uncertainty, but a more concrete rebuttal would still be better.
cultus|6 years ago From the former director of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network.https://www.washington.edu/boundless/earthquake-authority/ hyperpape|6 years ago While that's a useful counterpoint, it doesn't really provide an estimate of the damage that could be done.I'm thinking of questions like: 1. Are there areas where people currently live that shouldn't be inhabited? 2. What's the worst case death toll?I realize there's uncertainty, but a more concrete rebuttal would still be better.
hyperpape|6 years ago While that's a useful counterpoint, it doesn't really provide an estimate of the damage that could be done.I'm thinking of questions like: 1. Are there areas where people currently live that shouldn't be inhabited? 2. What's the worst case death toll?I realize there's uncertainty, but a more concrete rebuttal would still be better.
cultus|6 years ago
https://www.washington.edu/boundless/earthquake-authority/
hyperpape|6 years ago
I'm thinking of questions like: 1. Are there areas where people currently live that shouldn't be inhabited? 2. What's the worst case death toll?
I realize there's uncertainty, but a more concrete rebuttal would still be better.