(no title)
crdoconnor | 6 years ago
I was dubious before the crashes but after Boeing's reaction to the crashes I'm fairly sure I'd feel safer on their planes than Boeing's.
crdoconnor | 6 years ago
I was dubious before the crashes but after Boeing's reaction to the crashes I'm fairly sure I'd feel safer on their planes than Boeing's.
CrazyStat|6 years ago
If you flew, say, 10 times a year rather than 365.25, all on the 737 Max, it's a fraction of a percent chance.
Boeing's behavior was very poor and they have been rightfully taken to task for it. Aviation safety standards are incredibly high and the 737 Max didn't live up to those standards. The focus on cost cutting, selling critical redundant sensors as an upgrade to milk a little more cash out of buyers, mocking customers who wanted simulator training for their pilots, and more are all indicative of a bad corporate culture.
But the 737 Max is still a very safe plane. I have no qualms about flying on it.
neuro_image3|6 years ago
This works out to around 0.2% (1 in 2000) which is spectacularly poor odds for modern aviation where the typical risk of a crash on a single commercial airliner is around 1 in 5 million (less than 1 in 100 000 for 10 flights per year over 50 years - so basically 50 times less safe).
redis_mlc|6 years ago
No, no it's not safe.
Your entire argument is complete nonsense.
When the AoE sensor is damaged, the chance of a MAX problem is 100%.
> But the 737 Max is still a very safe plane. I have no qualms about flying on it.
It's grounded world-wide, so you're the only one.
crdoconnor|6 years ago