Perhaps worth noting that Kuhn wasn't attempting to lay out a methodology - he wasn't saying "this is how you should do science". Rather, he was a historian making generalizations about how different sciences developed.
It really is unfair to lump Kuhn in with Feyerabend. He was trying to document the historical process of scientific revolutions versus normal science. He was always resisted the broader inferences people have tried to draw from his work (something Horgan complains about in the article).
QuesnayJr|6 years ago