(no title)
zaneyard | 6 years ago
I don't think the company is looking to sell; it feels like the top is just not concerned with reliability and most of our funding goes into new feature development, which in turn makes things less stable.
Identifying what's wrong is probably the most difficult part for me. It feels like a systematic failure that I can't affect.
rossdavidh|6 years ago
But, it's not time wasted, if you analyze how it works. What happens when good suggestions are made? What is it about the business that makes the leaders unconcerned with reliability? Sometimes it's that the wrong metrics are being looked at (e.g. new customers, not looking at attrition rate). Sometimes it's that the people who can sign the checks for a sale are not the ones who use it, so new features (in theory) make a bigger difference to the bottom line than real-world reliability. Sometimes it's that there are too many levels of management between the top and the developers. It's an interesting problem to look at as a feedback loop, from reality/users to management, and figure out where the signal is getting lost or drowned out.
But, in the meantime, start looking for new jobs. Also, when interviewing for new jobs, try to find a way to talk about this which gets the point across about why you are dissatisfied, that does not sound so negative that you come across as a negative person. A diplomatic way of phrasing this may be important in a job interview, not a thing to try to come up with on the spot.
zaneyard|6 years ago