top | item 22232096

(no title)

jburwell | 6 years ago

I live 1.5 miles from the Crystal City HQ2 site in Alexandria, VA. Are there affordable housing, transportation, and public safety issues we have to address? Of course. Will we benefit from addressing these problems to add 25,000-35,000 jobs? Far more than the cost/difficulty of solving these problems.

We are thrilled to have them. We would much rather contend with growth problems than a loss of tax revenues, reduced property values, list employment, or low quality jobs. We have subsidize part of their expansion, but the growth will pay back that investment in 5-7 years. We can live that ROI.

EDIT: cleanup/clarification

discuss

order

arusahni|6 years ago

> Are there affordable housing, transportation, and public safety issues we have to address? Of course. Will we benefit from addressing these problems to add 25,000-35,000 jobs?

As an Arlingtoninian, I remain skeptical that a response of the appropriate magnitude will occur in the region. Those who aren't fortunate enough to have a well-paying job will be forced further outside of the beltway, further worsening their commutes. Affordable apartment buildings will continue to be overhauled and become "luxury", demanding an extra $300+ in rent a month. Well-maintained medium small businesses that were barely breaking even will be forced to shutter as banks and upscale gyms take their spots. This has happened in the region, and will only accelerate with HQ2.

> loss of tax revenues, reduced property values, list employment, or low quality jobs

AFAIK, Arlington was turning around their office vacancy rate before HQ2. Admittedly, it was more focused on the Rosslyn-Ballston corridor, but still...

lawnchair_larry|6 years ago

Increased property values are not really a benefit. That is more concisely restated as increased cost of living and higher costs of doing business. Retail costs rise in turn. Traffic gets worse. You feel like you’re making progress on paper, but it all just becomes a lot less livable.

ethanbond|6 years ago

Yep. Grocery stores have to pay rent, too.

HQ2 is a great case study on why we ought to have the Land Value Tax. Under this regime, wherever Amazon chooses to put their HQ would have all the same market mechanics occur (prices would still rise with the market) but the increase in prices would be seized as tax revenues and not as a windfall for landlords who had nothing to do with why Amazon chose to put HQ2 there. The region could then use this to e.g. build public housing, improve infrastructure, create functional transit hubs to allow people to disperse a bit while still remaining part of the community, etc.

dralley|6 years ago

Everyone that already owns property "has theirs", so of course they'll be excited about increasing property values.

LUmBULtERA|6 years ago

I'm a renter that lives a few blocks from the HQ2 site. I am not thrilled to have them, nor are any of my neighbors.

rexreed|6 years ago

Who would you rather have in that space?

beachy|6 years ago

> We are thrilled to have them.

The royal We?

Your comment would read better if you didn't claim to speak for some group - presumably anyone living within a few miles of the HQ2 site. I'm sure that many people could be found there that strongly disagree with your confident predictions:

> We have subsidize part of their expansion, but the growth will pay back that investment in 5-7 years.

paxswill|6 years ago

Most of the incentives are tied to specific goals; the bulk of the money is tied to specific numbers of jobs being added above a certain pay level (I think it was 25k jobs with an average salary over $100k/year, but haven’t gone back to find the article). Other incentives are contingent on revenues from a specific tax (hotel rooms I think) going up. The other big incentive isn’t Amazon exclusive: building a new campus for Virginia Tech nearby and increased funding for STEM education within the state.

victor9000|6 years ago

A similar story played out here in Seattle. Amazon transformed SLU into a business hub, bringing tens of thousands of high paying jobs to a previously underdeveloped neighborhood.

JackFr|6 years ago

'We' might refer to his family friends and neighbors, whom he probably knows better than you.

tvanantwerp|6 years ago

This only benefits the people who already own property in the region. As a renter, things are much worse for me post-HQ2 announcement. My wife and I have to accept that, though we love Arlington, we will almost certainly never be able to afford a home here and that we'll be priced out eventually. And we're well-paid professionals; anyone of more modest means is screwed.

remarkEon|6 years ago

I'm sympathetic to this view ... but on the other hand, every major metro area basically just set a floor for how much they're will to give out in tax breaks and perks to rich tech companies to bring in fancy real estate deals. There's something deeper going on here, where tech is investing money they seemingly don't know what to do with in land.

ethbro|6 years ago

> There's something deeper going on here, where tech is investing money they seemingly don't know what to do with in land.

... And before tech, video media.

... And before video media, radio.

... And before radio, railroads.

... And before railroads, newspapers.

... And before newspapers, ship captains.

... And before ship captains, cathedrals.

... And before cathedrals, banks.

... And before banks, kings.

If you're the currently atop the economic pyramid, you inevitably splurge on real estate.

silicon2401|6 years ago

What "we" do you mean? "I"? "My family"? As a lifelong resident of the general area, I and my "we" are certainly not remotely thrilled to have them.

heymijo|6 years ago

My understanding is that the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, which includes Alexandria/Arlington is one area in the country that is all but recession proof due to the high number of federal government and associated jobs. Thus loss of tax revenues and reduced property values just aren't a thing in this region.

c0restraint|6 years ago

I don’t know... We’re they spared the wrath of the last recession?

swiley|6 years ago

IMO if there’s any place on the east coast that can handle this (other than maybe NY but then again maybe not) it’s you guys. Every time I’m up there the metro lines and VRE get longer and there are one or two more high-rise apartment buildings. The price for a starter apartment is about the same as it is in most small American cities because of that.

Could it be better? Yes but I don’t think it’s better anywhere else.

cafard|6 years ago

A fellow I know lives in Washington, DC, a block and a half from the Columbia Heights metro. He expects to be charged more rent as the first result of the Crystal City HQ2. I imagine that Washington will gain some income tax revenue.

beamatronic|6 years ago

I love that area. It seems to already have by necessity, a lot of the required public infrastructure.