No, they're implying that there's been a failure by pro-leavers to acknowledge that many of these roles have been in the recent past been performed by immigrants from Europe.
Now with the UK's departure, employers may struggle to fill vacancies (and indeed it appears they have been - see link below), so the poster was sarcastically suggesting that they can't wait to see pro-leavers performing these tasks because it seems like in many cases UK nationals aren't willing to perform these types of roles.
The nature of the role is irrelevant and the poster wasn't suggesting that pro-leavers should be subject to degradation!
All we know is that UK nationals aren’t willing to do those jobs at the wages being offered. If employers raise wages to something liveable and decent then it’s reasonable to assume employment in those areas will increase.
grabeh|6 years ago
Now with the UK's departure, employers may struggle to fill vacancies (and indeed it appears they have been - see link below), so the poster was sarcastically suggesting that they can't wait to see pro-leavers performing these tasks because it seems like in many cases UK nationals aren't willing to perform these types of roles.
The nature of the role is irrelevant and the poster wasn't suggesting that pro-leavers should be subject to degradation!
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/oct/11/tonnes-of-c...
coolplants|6 years ago