I honestly think this is something Google mashed together overnight in response to Apple's annoucement.
Look at the page. It's just an informational landing page. no breakdown of the framework, pricing or any details, and once you click the signup button, you are put on a queue for a sales rep to contact you.
I love it though. It's a great case study for startups! I think they're gauging interest with this one, simple page.. and if enough people sign-up they will actually build it over the weekend.
The payment angle is timely given Apple's recent moves, but am I correct in reading this as Google offering an officially sanctioned way to get paywalled content into the index?
In the past, publishers had to either offer First Click Free or resort to cloaking or other black-hat techniques for their for-pay content. If Google is now willing to allow paywall content into the index for a 3% fee then that's a big deal.
I can't imagine this pushing search results quality in the right direction, at least from the perspective of a typical user.
Just saw an update (towards the bottom, http://bit.ly/hY8Jig)
"Huffington Post reports that publishers will keep 'in the range of 90%' of revenues from One Pass -- quite a nice bump from Apple's 70% offering."
The payment side is powered by Google Checkout, so the fee structure smacks Apple around all over the place. The most expensive tier (under $3000 in monthly sales) is 2.9% + $0.30. The cheapest is 1.9% + $0.30.
> The payment side is powered by Google Checkout, so the fee structure smacks Apple around all over the place.
Except for the part where as a vendor it's only available in half a dozen countries or so, and several major countries can not pay via Checkout either (does Checkout work at all from canada yet?), and where the customer service is non-existent (a Google constant).
They need to add other payment options then CreditCards to Google Checkout. Nobody uses CreditCards in Europe and it's kinda stupid that I can't even buy Apps on the Marketplace and have see if the vendor support direct purchase form their website via PayPal or something.
I like how google is empowering their developers with different pricing strategies. Before it was plain vanilla, either you pay, or its free. Yes you can pay for an app and within 15 minutes ask for a refund, but I have trouble sending in a rebate, I know i'll forgot within those 15 minutes.
With these extra payment options, and from what I understand, easy charging system, having someone drop a dollar on content with few clicks or even being able to implement coupons for your content/application will be greatly appreciated. =)
One Pass "also offers payments in mobile apps, in instances where the mobile OS terms permit transactions to take place outside of the app market." Nice dig.
If you read the Android Market terms of service, you'll see that you're not allowed to use any payment processor except Google Checkout. The only exception is if Google Checkout isn't available in your country.
In the blog post they say it will be "Open". What do they mean by that? Open source? Open for everyone in the world? From what I can tell in the post, it's only available in some countries, and it's also only available with Google Checkout.
I'm not saying those are bad things, just wondering what it has to do with "Open". Unless of course Google is just continuing to use it as a buzzword.
And there's no demonstration of how it works in the video or in any images. It's as if some people at Google decided to react to Apple's recent bad press by putting up a web page and a blog post announcing a product without actually having built anything yet.
It's not just in response to Apple, the timing is just fortuitous, O'Reilly's Tools of Change ( a publishing industry conference ) is on in New York this week and it was probably timed to coincide with that event.
I had an urge to implement something similar while ago using OpenID. Since OpenID authentication has a handshake between a content website and an identity provider, it would provide the perfect channel for handling accounting. Paying to read an article would be as simple as logging in.
It is undeniable that Google has enough gravity as an identity provider to encourage publishers to adopt such a model.
I don't really see how to get people to pay for an article sight unseen, though. Familiarity with content by known authors may be enough for some.
Pewpewarrows|15 years ago
Well played Schmidt, well played.
faramarz|15 years ago
Look at the page. It's just an informational landing page. no breakdown of the framework, pricing or any details, and once you click the signup button, you are put on a queue for a sales rep to contact you.
I love it though. It's a great case study for startups! I think they're gauging interest with this one, simple page.. and if enough people sign-up they will actually build it over the weekend.
geekfactor|15 years ago
In the past, publishers had to either offer First Click Free or resort to cloaking or other black-hat techniques for their for-pay content. If Google is now willing to allow paywall content into the index for a 3% fee then that's a big deal.
I can't imagine this pushing search results quality in the right direction, at least from the perspective of a typical user.
markszcz|15 years ago
Update: CNet's explination: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20032217-1.html
olalonde|15 years ago
MrMatt|15 years ago
pestaa|15 years ago
jonknee|15 years ago
masklinn|15 years ago
Except for the part where as a vendor it's only available in half a dozen countries or so, and several major countries can not pay via Checkout either (does Checkout work at all from canada yet?), and where the customer service is non-existent (a Google constant).
markszcz|15 years ago
zyb09|15 years ago
unknown|15 years ago
[deleted]
markszcz|15 years ago
I like how google is empowering their developers with different pricing strategies. Before it was plain vanilla, either you pay, or its free. Yes you can pay for an app and within 15 minutes ask for a refund, but I have trouble sending in a rebate, I know i'll forgot within those 15 minutes.
With these extra payment options, and from what I understand, easy charging system, having someone drop a dollar on content with few clicks or even being able to implement coupons for your content/application will be greatly appreciated. =)
abhigupta|15 years ago
modernerd|15 years ago
foobarbazetc|15 years ago
jbrennan|15 years ago
I'm not saying those are bad things, just wondering what it has to do with "Open". Unless of course Google is just continuing to use it as a buzzword.
nudge|15 years ago
uptown|15 years ago
theBobMcCormick|15 years ago
axx|15 years ago
mise|15 years ago
btipling|15 years ago
modernerd|15 years ago
AndyJPartridge|15 years ago
http://www.google.com/landing/onepass/
Edit: Ah, same problem. Sorry.
Edit 2: It's working now, but they are only after "some partners" so I guess it's a private Beta as such at the moment.
axx|15 years ago
clscott|15 years ago
tomkinstinch|15 years ago
It is undeniable that Google has enough gravity as an identity provider to encourage publishers to adopt such a model.
I don't really see how to get people to pay for an article sight unseen, though. Familiarity with content by known authors may be enough for some.
alanh|15 years ago
ck2|15 years ago
noodle|15 years ago
berlusconi|15 years ago
I'm thinking of previous discussions such as:
Google Checkout Nightmare and the $126,000 phone call:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1432107
masklinn|15 years ago
So I'd expect that to result in a "yes"
olalonde|15 years ago