top | item 22339780 (no title) newnewpdro | 6 years ago Strange for that wikipedia page to not contain a single graphic representation of what's being described. discuss order hn newest dangrossman|6 years ago The wiki's sources have a picture: https://www.cntraveler.com/story/more-than-half-the-worlds-p...Perhaps you'd like to be the one to ask the graphic's author for permission to add it to Wikipedia, or you'd like to create a graphic to add yourself. newnewpdro|6 years ago I had loaded that page and didn't see one, I guess it must require javascript. jacobwilliamroy|6 years ago The DIAMETER of such an area is very roughly 12 percent of Earth's CIRCUMFERENCE. So you could (probably) lay 8 of these areas around the equator, give or take a a couple. oefrha|6 years ago The earth’s circumference is ~4E4 km; the diameter of this circle is ~8E3 km. That’s 20%, not 2%. 2% would be utter madness. load replies (1) rdlw|6 years ago 20%, not 2%. So just under 5 would stretch around the equator. load replies (1)
dangrossman|6 years ago The wiki's sources have a picture: https://www.cntraveler.com/story/more-than-half-the-worlds-p...Perhaps you'd like to be the one to ask the graphic's author for permission to add it to Wikipedia, or you'd like to create a graphic to add yourself. newnewpdro|6 years ago I had loaded that page and didn't see one, I guess it must require javascript.
newnewpdro|6 years ago I had loaded that page and didn't see one, I guess it must require javascript.
jacobwilliamroy|6 years ago The DIAMETER of such an area is very roughly 12 percent of Earth's CIRCUMFERENCE. So you could (probably) lay 8 of these areas around the equator, give or take a a couple. oefrha|6 years ago The earth’s circumference is ~4E4 km; the diameter of this circle is ~8E3 km. That’s 20%, not 2%. 2% would be utter madness. load replies (1) rdlw|6 years ago 20%, not 2%. So just under 5 would stretch around the equator. load replies (1)
oefrha|6 years ago The earth’s circumference is ~4E4 km; the diameter of this circle is ~8E3 km. That’s 20%, not 2%. 2% would be utter madness. load replies (1)
dangrossman|6 years ago
Perhaps you'd like to be the one to ask the graphic's author for permission to add it to Wikipedia, or you'd like to create a graphic to add yourself.
newnewpdro|6 years ago
jacobwilliamroy|6 years ago
oefrha|6 years ago
rdlw|6 years ago