Why do they have FullSync on the front page? Last file update: 2005-03-08. Review page [1] has loads of mentions of non-running, non-syncing, and "too buggy to depend on". Not exactly a stellar project to be featuring so highly.
Meanwhile, it seems their navigation hasn't really changed, just received a new coat of paint. On the ScummVM pages, for instance: still shows 5 items in the main nav, unless support / develop is clicked. Then 4 more menu items and breadcrumbs appear, mouse-over menus on develop and the new ones, "support" changes to "donate", "share" appears out of nowhere, and the styling changes (different mouse-over font color on the navbar, for no reason). They also still have the crappy click-to-reload-the-page-to-navigate on the download-files list, side-by-side diff doesn't show word / character changes, just by line, and anything to do with the repo (browser, patches, etc) is a complete style and layout change from the rest of the site.
I worked there a little over a year ago and in that time they had 3-4 'makeovers'. In the same time they had like a 90% staff turnover including the CEO and a lot of upper management.
Interesting redesign. In 2009 they did a previous redesign, which Chris Wanstrath from GitHub critiqued at RailsConf http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUvq48Gb3w (Around 17:45). It looks like they've improved since then, but I couldn't even create a project, the system gave me a 400. Also, the site seems really slow, but possibly that's because they just relaunched.
While they get a lot of flak because they have supposedly lost to GitHub, I'll admit that far more people have heard of SourceForge compared the GitHub, and I must applaud their willingness to at least attempt a major redesign.
We use both. SourceForge brings to the table a huge distribution network. Webmin burns terabytes of transfer for millions of downloads every year. I'm not sure github is even in the game on that front, are they? They also host the webmin.com domain, for the time being, which saves us some bandwidth, as well.
But, we never used the VCS at SourceForge, and we barely touch the forums and bug tracker...if we could turn them off, we would.
My feelings exactly. SF still looks like some cheap JIRA install, not a hacker-friendly user-facing site like GitHub.
I get the impression they're undermanned, underfunded and under the weight of their technical debt. You just can't do all the cool things GitHub can when you're supporting SVN (do they still do CVS too?).
I'm not sure there are enough network effects to make it a winner take all market. Especially since systems like git make it so very easy to migrate elsewhere.
I am sad that you got downvoted because you have a discenting opinion. I am curious though, what do you like about the new design? More whitespace? Better color choice? New features?
[+] [-] Groxx|15 years ago|reply
Meanwhile, it seems their navigation hasn't really changed, just received a new coat of paint. On the ScummVM pages, for instance: still shows 5 items in the main nav, unless support / develop is clicked. Then 4 more menu items and breadcrumbs appear, mouse-over menus on develop and the new ones, "support" changes to "donate", "share" appears out of nowhere, and the styling changes (different mouse-over font color on the navbar, for no reason). They also still have the crappy click-to-reload-the-page-to-navigate on the download-files list, side-by-side diff doesn't show word / character changes, just by line, and anything to do with the repo (browser, patches, etc) is a complete style and layout change from the rest of the site.
Put it back in the oven, it's not done yet.
[1]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/fullsync/reviews/?sort=usefu...
[+] [-] sfstinks|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] icco|15 years ago|reply
While they get a lot of flak because they have supposedly lost to GitHub, I'll admit that far more people have heard of SourceForge compared the GitHub, and I must applaud their willingness to at least attempt a major redesign.
[+] [-] andycroll|15 years ago|reply
http://www.scummvm.org/news/20110212/ http://github.com/scummvm/scummvm
[+] [-] olalonde|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] noonat|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] diziet|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] enthalpyx|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] axod|15 years ago|reply
Quantcast: http://www.quantcast.com/profile/trafficGraph?wunit=wd%3Anet...
Trends: http://trends.google.com/websites?q=sourceforge.net,+github....
Alexa: http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?&w=400&h=220&o=f&...;
By what measure are you talking about? Ah of course. The "It's shiny new so hot right now within my small circle of friends!" metric.
[+] [-] SwellJoe|15 years ago|reply
But, we never used the VCS at SourceForge, and we barely touch the forums and bug tracker...if we could turn them off, we would.
[+] [-] Lewisham|15 years ago|reply
I get the impression they're undermanned, underfunded and under the weight of their technical debt. You just can't do all the cool things GitHub can when you're supporting SVN (do they still do CVS too?).
[+] [-] dschobel|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] djhworld|15 years ago|reply
But for me, personally, Github has won, I prefer it when projects have a Github repo
[+] [-] davidw|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] iM8t|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] icco|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]