(no title)
caro_douglos | 6 years ago
The first time I saw grandmaster level play in person was a queen sacrifice which led to bishops mating the king in short order.
caro_douglos | 6 years ago
The first time I saw grandmaster level play in person was a queen sacrifice which led to bishops mating the king in short order.
casion|6 years ago
If there was a way to not be mated it'd be referred to as "Tactics" or just "A Combination".
And further annoying pedantry: there's no points in chess outside of match or tournament score. Pieces have _possible_ pawn-equated values that someone can use for evaluation, but those are very loose. It's possible to have a naive material evaluation that is not in your favour and still be in a significantly winning position. Better players think in terms of a pieces ability to control squares, how soon it might control squares, the importance of those squares, the potential value of reducing another player's board control, the ability to create tactical threats etc... there's a couple dozen potential evaluative concepts that are often more important than piece value.
Funny enough, your example of a queen sacrifice demonstrates this ;)
iCarrot|6 years ago
Having all those said, the type of piece is still the bigger factor in deciding the value of the piece. You don't often see a queen-knight trade for example. Queen sac is definitely something you don't see every game.