The writing is quite confusing in trying to explain things but the gist of it appears to be that the person in question (1) applied for IP addresses through numerous companies created just for this purpose in order to bypass ARIN's restriction on the number of addresses it was willing to allocate to a single entity, and (2) made the obtained IP address ranges available to serve as VPN endpoints, so that "huge amount of traffic—some of it illicit or criminal—passed through its computer servers but wasn't traceable to the true originators."
He did keep track though of which VPN operator used which range at any given time, so perhaps the "true originators" could be traceable after all, assuming the VPN owners were willing to co-operate. In any case, he is only being prosecuted for (1), and the immediate reason for this is that a couple of US politicians were hacked with attacks originating from these addresses.
A prosecution seems a bit over the top for this... Setting up multiple companies to meet some rule isnt against said rule. And anyway, it's a company policy not the law.
I can come up with at least 3 distinct meanings for “amassed VPN clients” and I’m still not 100% sure which is correct in this context. I take it that clients here refers to “paying customers”?
> He said Micfo provides a legitimate service to VPNs, adding that whatever his customers or their users do through Micfo servers is none of his business.
From what I understand he was attributed many IPs by creating shell companies and rented these IPs to VPN providers.
The concept of ownership of an IP address, implied by “obtains”, is pretty clear and well-understood. The story was exactly what I imagined after reading the headline. Rather than making an obtuse joke, how would you suggest it be improved?
masayoshis_son|6 years ago
He did keep track though of which VPN operator used which range at any given time, so perhaps the "true originators" could be traceable after all, assuming the VPN owners were willing to co-operate. In any case, he is only being prosecuted for (1), and the immediate reason for this is that a couple of US politicians were hacked with attacks originating from these addresses.
londons_explore|6 years ago
nmc|6 years ago
krebsonsecurity|6 years ago
bitxbitxbitcoin|6 years ago
neonate|6 years ago
checkyoursudo|6 years ago
nicolaslem|6 years ago
From what I understand he was attributed many IPs by creating shell companies and rented these IPs to VPN providers.
dang|6 years ago
unknown|6 years ago
[deleted]
lmilcin|6 years ago
qz_|6 years ago
esotericn|6 years ago
unknown|6 years ago
[deleted]
johnklos|6 years ago
dang|6 years ago
This is in the FAQ at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html and there's more explanation here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989
https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...
beeschlenker|6 years ago
[deleted]
_-___________-_|6 years ago
I "obtained" 2^32 IPv4 addresses pretty easily; not sure if it's legitimate or not:
Edit: Well, this was unpopular. In case it's too subtle, my point is that the title is terrible.0x0|6 years ago
skywhopper|6 years ago