top | item 22571040

(no title)

pdeuchler | 6 years ago

DO NOT DO THIS!

This is crazy FUD that will only make the situation worse. Stockpiling rarely, if ever, helps, and overwhelmingly hurts the poor and disabled. The absolute worst of "fuck you got mine" mentality on display here. Please do not do this, and please do not advocate for this kind of panic. You are actively contributing to a terrible situation.

To repeat: there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to stockpile rations, food stuffs, common goods, etc. In no country as of yet has this been necessary, even in the most hard hit areas. Do not do this. Going to the grocery store once vs four times is not going to make the difference between you getting the virus or not, and it's absurd that people would even consider this. The virus has been in and around our communities for months now, engaging in prepper fetishes now is closing the barn door after the horses have left. Stockpiling goods is completely ineffective anyway. The majority of our supply chains are JIT, and suppliers are already rationing and metering out goods. Stockpiling is pointless, you're just going to look like an idiot in the check out line.

Limit large social engagements. Keep up mild exercise, get plenty of sleep, and eat healthily. And for the love of God wash your hands. If you have frequent contact with immunocompromised people or the elderly be more vigilant about hygiene, wear a mask, disinfect any surfaces the both of you touch frequently. Consider doing their errands for them as well.

Everyone will eventually get the virus. It's almost certain. The goal here is just to prevent a thundering herd problem with medical resources.

discuss

order

Yetanfou|6 years ago

It is not about food no longer being available, it is about not having to go out and get it for a longer period of time. Limiting contacts does help in limiting spread so the more people limit contacts, the longer it will take for the virus to spread.

> Everyone will eventually get the virus. It's almost certain. The goal here is just to prevent a thundering herd problem with medical resources.

Yes, eventually everyone will be exposed. The point here is to flatten the curve of exposure to a level which does not overwhelm critical care facilities. This can be achieved - or at least an attempt can be made - by limiting exposure. Those who have enough food at home to refrain from having to go out shopping for a month can limit their exposure more than those who have to go out every week.

> Going to the grocery store once vs four times is not going to make the difference between you getting the virus or not, and it's absurd that people would even consider this.

But that is not the point as you later state yourself: "The goal here is just to prevent a thundering herd problem with medical resources". Right, and the way to achieve that is by limiting exposure, for instance by only having to go out shopping once instead of four times.

I honestly don't get the attitude against a certain level of preparedness. What is wrong with stocking more non-perishable food stuffs at home if those are the things you'd normally buy anyway? You don't need to fill your basements with MREs, just get more of the usual non-perishables than you'd normally do - pasta, wheat flour, oats, etc. Get some yeast to bake bread as well while you're at it. Get butter, put it in the freezer. Dried beans last forever - I had some around which I took with me when I moved from the Netherlands to Sweden about 20 years ago, made a chilli with them, tasted 'like new' - and can make a good meal with a few odds and ends. Get 'canned' (i.e. packaged) tomatoes, frozen vegetables (the power will stay on during this crisis), etc. This is not doomsday prepping, it is common sense.

pdeuchler|6 years ago

> I honestly don't get the attitude against a certain level of preparedness. What is wrong with stocking more non-perishable food stuffs at home if those are the things you'd normally buy anyway? You don't need to fill your basements with MREs, just get more of the usual non-perishables than you'd normally do - pasta, wheat flour, oats, etc. Get some yeast to bake bread as well while you're at it. Get butter, put it in the freezer. Dried beans last forever - I had some around which I took with me when I moved from the Netherlands to Sweden about 20 years ago, made a chilli with them, tasted 'like new' - and can make a good meal with a few odds and ends. Get 'canned' (i.e. packaged) tomatoes, frozen vegetables (the power will stay on during this crisis), etc. This is not doomsday prepping, it is common sense.

I have no problem with this, but that's clearly not what GP is advocating for. I doubt most in this thread even comprehend how much food is required for a 30 day supply of your average household. Buying double the amount of perishables doesn't seem unreasonable, stocking up for a month+ is absurd.

dilly_li|6 years ago

> Going to the grocery store once vs four times is not going to make the difference between you getting the virus or not

Not sure if I'd agree with this. In my neighborhood, there are already multiple confirmed cases (some a few blocks away).

The only way to minimize my (and therefore my family's) exposure to the virus is to avoid any external contact. Encountering 10 people for one grocery trip versus 40 people over 4 separate trips. Statistically, I'd take the one-trip option.

pdeuchler|6 years ago

Please think this through. You're not completing a 6 week grocery trip in the same period of time as a single week grocery trip. You're going to be touching the same amount of items, you're going to be breathing in the grocery store air for the same amount of time.

Even if there was a marginal benefit to yourself it would be still be incredibly selfish to stockpile to the detriment of the vulnerable. The scarcity mentality is very dangerous, please do not perpetuate it.

SketchySeaBeast|6 years ago

> engaging in prepper fetishes

That's exactly how I feel about stuff like that. I had only heard a quarantine's amount, but given the amount of made up stuff going around, I was hoping there'd be some sort of expert explaining the logic, and for it not to be just prepper fever.

sneak|6 years ago

I am deeply saddened to see the most basic of simple preparedness being mocked so emotionally.

> This is crazy FUD

There's no fear, uncertainty, or doubt in my message, nor am I being crazy, simply calm and rational: it's simple, normal preparedness for the recommended protocol of avoiding unnecessary close physical contact with others. Having 6-8 weeks of food in one's house isn't stockpiling, nor is it panic. It is everyday preparedness, and is good advice in all times, even outside of pandemics.

The LDS church, for example, recommends and encourages all mormons to have a year of food for their family in their home, and has done so for decades. I am not LDS, but this is not bad advice in general.

> Going to the grocery store once vs four times is not going to make the difference between you getting the virus or not

If you and your family are in full isolation at home during the worst of this, not going out in public at all during the peak of the pandemic (zero contact with anyone infected or potentially infected) versus going out four times into public places (grocery stores) absolutely makes a difference, both in your own potential exposure, as well as in the ability to spread it to others should you be exposed.

Right now most cities in the US only have a few hundred cases walking around (calculated from comparing the curve to other countries who actually are testing). That's not going to be the case in 30 days: the risk and spread is going up in a predictable, exponential fashion, just as we have seen in several other places already.

> engaging in prepper fetishes

Your alarming personal attacks do not contribute to the discussion. I'm not suggesting you build a bunker, hoard masks or TP, or anything else like that: simply have enough food to be able to stay home uninterrupted for a month or two. Mocking doomsday preppers when they're preparing for unknown, low-risk imagined threats is one thing. Preparing to simply have enough to eat while you and your family stay home during a global pandemic and presently-declared national emergency is about as non-prepper as it gets: preppers would claim it's way past the time you should have started.

Millions of Americans buy in bulk at stores like Sam's Club and Costco, this is no different. If the supply lines are as stable as you claim and will remain so as you claim, then they won't be harmed in any way by a few people buying a little bit extra.

> Everyone will eventually get the virus. It's almost certain.

This is also not true. Many people will avoid getting sick by avoiding public places and physical contact, which also has the added public benefit of not spreading it further. Additionally there will likely be a vaccine before the year is out. Avoiding contact with the public absolutely can and will prevent many people from getting sick. Please do not engage in such fatalistic fear-spreading; it's just a false statement. (It's also a terrible thing to say to high-risk groups, most of whom can avoid contracting it with precautions such as I describe.)

> The goal here is just to prevent a thundering herd problem with medical resources.

The single best way to do that is to avoid contracting the virus at all. The single best way to do that is to avoid coming into contact with anyone who is infected or might be infected: get home and stay home.

https://staythefuckhome.com/

It is our responsibility to ourselves, our families, our neighbors, and our communities to avoid contracting this virus and to avoid spreading this virus.