top | item 22588584

United hides cheapest flights from passengers affected by Coronavirus

230 points| jrdngonen | 6 years ago |bookwithcarry.com

51 comments

order
[+] benmarks|6 years ago|reply
I’m not going to divorce my wife so I can run away with United, but I hope this crew has a lot more than the single example to level these charges I hope they are taking care buckets into consideration (right or wrong, changing this at the IT level can’t be quick or easy). It will be curious to see others replicate this and if so, United’s response, because that would be egregious and certainly something for them to resolve.
[+] tejasmanohar|6 years ago|reply
Author here. Didn't realize this blew up on HN...

We don't know the cause of the difference in price, but we're comparing two basic economy tickets here so if there's any fare difference, United should at least clarify to the user why...

United and other airlines are running ads [0] on how users can book w/ confidence and get free changes so IMO, it's just irresponsible to have things like this slip through the cracks-- intentional or not.

Overall, United has been consistently being anti-user with their policies related to coronavirus. For example, making users wait 12 months to get a cash refund [1] if your flight is delayed by them. Not a great look.

[0]: https://twitter.com/tejasmanohar/status/1239332916070473728

[1]: https://www.dansdeals.com/points-travel/airlines/united/unit...

[+] lanpaje|6 years ago|reply
I was able to replicate this scenario with another booking. Definitely not just a lone incident. United sucks.
[+] splonk|6 years ago|reply
Yeah, I'm not going to say United is some shining beacon of a company, but all I'm seeing here is that somebody representing a company that "book[s] a lot of travel" doesn't seem to understand how fare classes work. I'm not saying it's impossible that United is pulling a fast one here, but this blog post does not show sufficient evidence one way or another. If this showed up in my inbox as a bug report, I'd send it back to QA with a request for more information and reproduction steps.

(Former travel industry person who triaged way, way too many bug reports about fare differences when changing flights)

[+] pxx|6 years ago|reply
Yeah, this doesn't really pass the sniff test. Can we get details regarding the fare basis codes before/after?
[+] nostromo|6 years ago|reply
Put another way: if you bought a flight from X to Y before covid-19, and then you canceled that flight and received a voucher -- that voucher will still only buy you a flight from X to Y, even though prices have dropped.

That seems... totally fair? Why should you be able to buy two flights from X to Y when you canceled only one? I get that prices are now lower, but your price is the same as when you originally bought the flight.

[+] tejasmanohar|6 years ago|reply
Author here...

Might be misunderstanding, but United is letting you change the route (X to Y) and dates between flights-- that's not the problem. What's messed up here is that United is not showing you the best prices available on the market when you're actually changing your flight, and that's regardless of what route or type of flight you're changing to.

To summarize, one of our users bought a flight and when they went to change it, United showed us the "new flight's price" as something almost twice the actual online rate if you search on United.com or GFlights.

[+] lisper|6 years ago|reply
> Why should you be able to buy two flights from X to Y when you canceled only one?

Not all flights from X to Y are created equal. Some are direct, some connect. Some are at more convenient times. Some are on nicer aircraft. Some have more empty seats.

[+] rmrfrmrf|6 years ago|reply
Because that's what they're worth. Live by the market, die by the market.
[+] atian|6 years ago|reply
Personally, I think United is pricing flight changes in every way possible to minimize losses for flights sold when Coronavirus was not taken into account – maybe an incompetent management team.

What additionally suggests this is customers who are offered credit for flight changes due to COVID-19 need to wait an ENTIRE year (12-months!) in order see a refund back to original payment source [1].

[1]: https://www.dansdeals.com/points-travel/airlines/united/unit...

[+] cameldrv|6 years ago|reply
Which they won't see because United will be bankrupt by then.
[+] dannyw|6 years ago|reply
I have a flight from SYD to NYC on May 2nd.

While there is no entry restrictions yet, I expect it to ramp up soon. When I come back to Australia, I'll be mandated to self-isolate for 14 days.

The Australian Government has warned to reconsider all air travel.

I'm looking to cancel this trip, however it looks like I'll only have the opportunity if reschedules this flight. Even if so, I won't get a refund for 12 months.

I'm not happy about this.

[+] taborj|6 years ago|reply
How is this different than the price gouging the hand sanitizer guy did?
[+] amiga_500|6 years ago|reply
People should be asking that question on a lot of life's essentials, where the "provider" removed it from the market only to sell it back at a higher price having added no value.
[+] Waterluvian|6 years ago|reply
Or the Americans for trying to corner the market on a potential vaccine in development.
[+] shoulderfake|6 years ago|reply
In usa when a corporation does it, its legal. When individual does it, they get pinched.
[+] mxcrossb|6 years ago|reply
Interesting. I have a few tickets that qualify for free rebooking. My experience was though that every future time slot costs more money. This has left me paralyzed, because I’m not sure if I should just give up on the money, or double down on the very high risk that we’re still avoiding travel for the rest of the year.
[+] dannyw|6 years ago|reply
It's quite simply not true that every future time slot costs more money.

Try putting those dates in Google Flights and I'm sure that your "$1000" flight is now... $700 or something.

[+] irjustin|6 years ago|reply
I'm sitting at SFO right now waiting to get on UA 1 back to Singapore so I can go home.

My personal, anecdotal, experience defends United but it's not perfect.

Let's dive in -

1. I was originally set to fly on Apr 5 on UA 1.

2. Obviously I wanted to move it up, so I set it for Mar 24.

3. In the process, I had a premium economy seat bundle that would not automatically transfer.

4. I called, 1 hour on hold. Moved days & seats no new charge. The price of the new flight was cheaper by US$10, I did not see any money back.

5. Today, Mar 15, I decided to go home on tonight's UA 1 flight.

6. Called, 1.5 hours on hold, moved my date and my premium economy seat.

7. I realized I had a bundled extra bag with my old seat. Normally not refundable she said, but she would try. She tried, she got the extra bag refunded no problem, saved me $67.

That whole list boils down to - I lost $10 in price difference but gained $67 back in a refund that I would not normally get.

Overall I'm very happy.

Everyone flying, stay safe and healthy!

[+] zaroth|6 years ago|reply
What if the difference is based on the fare code that the original ticket was booked under, and the rebooking ticket must be made into the same fare code?

So a lower priced fare code is available but not for the rebooking process?

[+] sricola|6 years ago|reply
Yeah, lots of facts missing here. and the facts don't add up. I still think the original itinerary was a round trip - and the total fare being shown is a round trip fare. The author/CTO of the company this "blog" is on has yet to clarify.

If the facts are fudged, this is shameful. Airlines are still terrible companies, but this is shameful.

[+] jchw|6 years ago|reply
I genuinely can’t grasp the nerve required for this to have been decided and put into place. It feels like nothing is too scummy to not happen.
[+] tbrock|6 years ago|reply
United is THE worst. I hope they go under and another airline places their hub at SFO. They treat their customers like garbage.
[+] lotsofpulp|6 years ago|reply
They’re not going anywhere. They have EWR/SFO/DEN/ORD/IAD/LAX. I wonder what could cause many of the big companies today to go under, other than their whole product being obsoleted.
[+] pbreit|6 years ago|reply
How is this virus related? Can anyone confirm this is new behavior or that there is not an explanation?
[+] tnuc|6 years ago|reply
Being price gouged by airlines is nothing new, this is business as usual.
[+] et2o|6 years ago|reply
I think the extensive and permissive rebooking offers are COVID related.
[+] sricola|6 years ago|reply
Obviously facts are fudged here. The original itinerary is a round trip that costed 491. With the return leg change, that cost went up to $596 (roundtrip). And they are showing a one way costing 299. This is fake and the company is looking for free publicity.
[+] tejasmanohar|6 years ago|reply
I'm sorry, but that's blatantly false. The original itinerary is a one-way flight, not a round-trip.

I'll send the original receipt in a few minutes once I scrub all sensitive passenger information.

[+] tgafpc2|6 years ago|reply
"We here at Carry book a lot of travel." We'll apparently not. There's literally 100 reasons why this would happen in the normal course of business.