Ask HN: Please review my webapp (Streetread)
36 points| mstefff | 18 years ago |streetread.com | reply
My latest web application went public today and I'd love to hear some input from everyone. The site is called Streetread. I've been dubbing it 'Google Reader meets Wall Street'. Streetread is a single-page ajax-driven interface that simplifies the process of gathering the large amount of news and data that flood Wall Street every day. The site aggregates the latest headlines from over 20 of the leading financial sites as well as from all of the stocks you choose to follow. The interface makes sifting through the content extremely easy and the articles are even presented within the same page. Basic stock charts/quotes display with the stocks you follow, etc. Please check it out and let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Mike
[+] [-] mstefff|18 years ago|reply
My latest web application went public today and I'd love to hear some input from everyone. The site is called Streetread. I've been dubbing it 'Google Reader meets Wall Street'. Streetread is a single-page ajax-driven interface that simplifies the process of gathering the large amount of news and data that flood Wall Street every day. The site aggregates the latest headlines from over 20 of the leading financial sites as well as from all of the stocks you choose to follow. The interface makes sifting through the content extremely easy and the articles are even presented within the same page. Basic stock charts/quotes display with the stocks you follow, etc. Please check it out and let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Mike
[+] [-] j2d2|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] j2d2|18 years ago|reply
My email address is in my contact info.
[+] [-] webwright|18 years ago|reply
If I want news about a symbol, I should be able to type it in.
A vertical list of news sources would be MUCH more scannable.
[+] [-] astine|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] khangtoh|18 years ago|reply
Ubuntu 8.04, FF 2.0.0.14
[+] [-] cjc|18 years ago|reply
1) the scrolling simply does not work as expected
2) you unnecessarily reinvented the scroll bar (axod elaborates very well on this)
3) needing to sign up before typing in a ticker symbol is a major turn off
These are all easily fixable problems, but you are showing little interest in listening to user feedback. Here are three things you said:
"I've barely had any issues with the scrolling"
"if you're at the top, you shouldn't scroll up, you should scroll down"
"There isn't anything wrong with the wrap-around"
It is easy to become blind to the deficiencies of interfaces you create. Of course the wrap-around seems logical to you because you created it. However, and this is really important, almost every single HN commenter had a problem with it. If you want your app to become popular and maybe even profitable, you MUST listen closely to your users/customers. Even if you do not agree with our collective advice, it is detrimental to openly tell your potential users that they are wrong.
So in a nutshell, open up to this constructive criticism. Your site looks very nice and offers a hefty collection of important financial news. Beware, though, that if developers cannot figure out the interface, suits won't stand a chance.
[+] [-] mstefff|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] czstrong|18 years ago|reply
I'm at a large Nation-wide law firm and stuck on IE6. I imagine there are Wall-Street corporationss that are also still using old browsers.
[+] [-] iron_ball|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baha_man|18 years ago|reply
Also, the name 'streetread' made me think it would be something like Google Maps rather than a stock quote site.
Looks very nice, though.
[+] [-] j2d2|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] axod|18 years ago|reply
You display some articles, then I scrollwheel, and things go bezerk. I scrollwheel down and it jumps up and down like a kid with hyperactivity disorder. There's no scrollbar - I have no idea where I am in the list of stories. Trying to match up where I was with where I am now is pretty hard. You've put up/down/top/bottom buttons at the very top and called them "Navigate".
So you've reimplemented a scrollbar (Standard browser UI component), but very very badly.
Up and down keys don't scroll properly either. If I hold down a key, it should keep repeating. Pressing a key should scroll the amount I am used to. You seem to be scrolling by a lot, on keyup - not what people expect.
Sorry, but I just hate it when people reinvent something that already exists, is standard, and works. Especially when their implementation is completely unusable.
Why not just use a scrollbar like people expect?
Also when I click on an article to read it, I expect to click [back], to go back, instead of clicking on [return to the reader]. Once again, ignoring standard browser usability.
Also if you try to open an article link in a new window, or copy it to send to a friend etc, it breaks, and you land at the homepage (I assume you're using onclick etc). Another usability flaw.
[+] [-] mstefff|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mstefff|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chollida1|18 years ago|reply
If your going to target the investment banking community, you'll find we want our information fast. You'll notice the old stock tickers had symbols whizzing bye, not slowly scrolling.
If I detect even the slightest lag I'll go somewhere else, probably an rss reader.
[+] [-] j2d2|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JimEngland|18 years ago|reply
UI issue: When I click on a stock, I get the stock quote and information on the right side just fine. However, it does not say anywhere the name of the company. I think that putting the company name above the stock quote on the right frame would be useful.
External links: When linking to an external site (such as Google Finance) "Open in a new Window" does not work for me. Also, the bookmarks link is a bit confusing; it shows a few icons (like del.icio.us) and one could think that clicking on a part of that bookmarks icon would be linking to that particular service. Finally, the top bar (the Streetread part) seems to blend into the external page at times; maybe use part of the dark blue header in the design of the external top bar?
Overall, I think that this is a great service so far, good work!
[+] [-] mstefff|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jjburka|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mstefff|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] steveplace|18 years ago|reply
What advantages does this have over me hopping over to Yahoo Finance and plugging in a ticker?
Also, I get live news feeds in my trading platform for any security.
I know you've probably done competitive analysis, but here are some other sites that do pretty cool stuff too:
theflyonthewall.com (fastest news out there) stocktwits.com (twitter + stock mashup)
Good Luck.
[+] [-] avinashv|18 years ago|reply
Seems like an interesting idea, but there's no way I'd use it in this state.
[+] [-] sebg|18 years ago|reply
Also, it seems to me that you are going against Reuters, Bloomberg, finance.google, and finance.yahoo. What is your value added there?
Good Luck!
[+] [-] ig1|18 years ago|reply
You won't even touch the professional markets dominated by reuter/bloomberg/etc. They're playing a whole different ballgame.
Which means you'll have to go after the google/yahoo/ms finance market. Which might be possible, but you don't look to have any competitive advantage over those services at all. While on the other hand they have vast competitive advantages over you.
My gut feeling from your site and your comments is that you've gone into this project without a good understanding of the market (what's currently available, why people use it) and without a clear user in mind.
My personal opinion is that you should scrap it, chalk up the experience, and have another go, but this time concentrate on something you have domain knowledge of.
[+] [-] uuilly|18 years ago|reply
Personally I don't care about the market so I'm not the one to ask. But I thought your site did what it needed to do well... Godspeed.
[+] [-] Stabback|18 years ago|reply
Center the instructions vertically as to not have so much empty space. Although it will still be the same amount, it will look like less.
How about multithreading? As in when you click on one it becomes active, allowing you to have more than one news source active at a time. Weave the news entries by date and color code them (not everything, but maybe a color code a symbol at the start).
If you implement the above, how about having categories? Sports, world and business, etc? The possibility for sports from the New York Times and International Business from Reuters would be a major feature.
Like I said, great idea. Some more work would make it amazing.
*edit: I like my scrollbar. I have come to expect my scrollbar from websites. Give me my scrollbar back, it acts as a visual clue to where I am and it allows for intuitive navigation. Don't force me to use your system.
[+] [-] sc|18 years ago|reply
The scrolling, vertical, ticker-like lists tripped me up for a second, though. I thought the left-hand arrow, pointing to the left, would scroll the list in left, that it would kind of pull the list in that direction like a ticker.
[+] [-] swombat|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mstefff|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mstefff|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mstefff|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tstegart|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dmix|18 years ago|reply
First two things that stood out to me: 1) I would like to be able to input a stock symbol on my own with out signing up, that would show how its valuable to me personally without jumping through hoops. 2) Search, I'd like to be able to search the multiple sources if possible. I'm guessing your just aggregating feeds, but it would be a quality feature.
[+] [-] terpua|18 years ago|reply
1) Ability to add our own news/blog sources (good for you to expand news sources) 2) Remove username from registration (I realize it's only one field but it's one field less to fill in and don't see the point to it) 3) Make news sources font smaller and in different color. If hyperlinked, it will go to the actual collection of articles from that news source.
Simple stock news engine for hobby investors. Useful app.
[+] [-] elai|18 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ideamonk|18 years ago|reply