In other words, they're pre-censoring content according to what they'd deem harmful misinformation according to their selected group of experts?
I'd find it better to have these experts pass votes on the factual correctness of articles, but not censor the entire article. This way, the general public can also verify how the expert group works, which shouldn't be left unattended.
[+] [-] klingonopera|6 years ago|reply
I'd find it better to have these experts pass votes on the factual correctness of articles, but not censor the entire article. This way, the general public can also verify how the expert group works, which shouldn't be left unattended.