The most recent data is from 2018, when they had an income of about 43M of which about 3.4M goes to the top 10 paid employees and the top two get 0.7M and 0.8M. The total salary budget is 35M, 25M of which are for "program services" (I guess creating content, developing the platform, etc.). This looks more reasonable compared to an organisation like Mozilla. Other things that jump out are half a million in legal fees and 1.8M for fundraising. In total, 43M out of 49M expenses in 2018 went to "program services", and they were running at a slight deficit. Looks pretty OK to me.
Assuming "information technology" means hosting, that's about 5M. Doing that times 2.5 would indeed create quite a problem, and that's assuming they don't need more people working on it to keep up with the new crowd.
Ahh.. Khan Academy.. the usefulness this site provided throughout my middle and high school education. Quite frankly, it literally saved my ass. I've gone ahead and donated $1K.
> the usefulness this site provided throughout my middle and high school education
I'm a deal past these periods in my life, and I did quite well via just arbitrary memorization, at the cost of never really developing an intuitive understanding, and therefore a true appreciation, for subjects like math. I've only recently started going through KA's courses, starting all the way back in Algebra.
If anyone from Khan Academy is reading this: I tried to donate and my transaction was flagged as "suspicious", now my card is blocked. Probably because their PSP doesn't seem to implement 3DSecure. What's grating is that after I tried to donate I had to solve a bunch of reCaptchas before it showed me the failure status.
Very likely Khan Academy can't help. Also your bank probably doesn't know why and neither does their fraud prevention service provider that runs some machine learning/AI system somewhere that decided to flag your transaction. At least that has been my experience in dealing with these things.
I had a similar experience now. Never had to do reCaptcha on a payment form with my phone before. And then the payment was rejected. I am a normal US credit card payer. I ended up using PayPal.
I've been a fan of Khan Academy since they were just some Youtube videos.
You can find Khan Academy's past Form 990 online and I've been archiving them.
Sal Khan made:
2008: ? ($0 revenue)
2009: ?
2010: $70,833
2011: $348,879
2012: $348,529
2013: $348,292
2014: $548,116
2015: $800,000
2016: $815,000
2017: $785,000
2018: $824,000
You can see that, just like a startup, the sacrifice in the beginning as a founder is real. Before 2010 his salary from KA was probably 0 or significantly less. $70K in 2010 was less than my new grad salary. The jump in 2011 to $350K is around how much a senior makes in HCOL areas now. There has been basically no adjustment in his earning for 4 years from 2015 to 2018.
From the 990 forms, you can also get a sense of how much other people in the organization are being paid. I think all of them can command higher compensation elsewhere, but choose to work at KA because leveling the playing field for education is such a great mission.
Sal Khan's compensation as a CEO is only ~3.x times of many senior positions in the organization. Not outrageous at all.
In 2008's Form 990, Sal Khan wrote that KA is being used by 10,000 students daily. I don't know how many accounts, but growing from that to 71 million in 2018 is incredible. The impact to the world is undeniable.
I quite enjoyed khan academy when it was just Khan doing lectures. They were terrific.
I can't imagine, though, that servers should account for any sizable amount of overall expense. Is this really an issue for them? The linked page didn't seem to talk about it.
Khan Academy isn't just composed of only youtube lectures, but a sophisticated platform for doing math problems, computer programming education, and so forth.
Why do you say that? In my company our cloud bill is the largest expense after salaries. We're constantly watching those costs as they can get out of control quite quickly
It's a nonprofit organization. I'm not that educated on the topic but I think that means it's possible to find a breakdown of their expenses somewhere.
Here's the video of Sal Khan talking about the donations [0]. Not much additional information, aside that he said they were already running on deficit before this crisis.
I was hoping to find more info on the "250% nominal load" mentioned in the title. However, I didn't see anything about load on the linked page, just a generic looking donation page.
I'm a bit biased, because I focus on CPU efficiency for a major CDN, but I'd be super curious what exactly is at 250%? Network bandwidth? CPU? IOPS? Are there big hammers that they can use to get things back under control without adding servers, like reducing bitrate, or turning off "fancy" features?
Features which use a lot of CPU are tracking learner progress, managing classrooms, and the like. These features are really important right now as teachers have moved classes online.
We are in the process of moving this code to Go, which should still be very productive for us but also reduce how much CPU is required.
I’m a bit surprised it’s so little. Our servers are at something like 1000% of normal load. We’re a data visualisation company: naively I would have expected online education to be affected more than us, rather than less.
I’m curious how much internet usage is up in general. My site that people use to map running and walking routes is up about 2.5x as well since around March 16.
Note that Wikimedia has a huge income already. They're important and valuable, but if we're talking about who doesn't get enough publicity and donations, it's not Wikipedia/Wikimedia.
"The Public Domain Review is dedicated to the exploration of curious and compelling works from the history of art, literature, and ideas – focusing on works now fallen into the public domain, the vast commons of out-of-copyright material that everyone is free to enjoy, share, and build upon without restrictions."
As an educator, this service is an invaluable supplemental resource for my kids. Especially now. Just donated without hesitation. I hope you all consider doing the same if you have the means.
[+] [-] Aachen|6 years ago|reply
The most recent data is from 2018, when they had an income of about 43M of which about 3.4M goes to the top 10 paid employees and the top two get 0.7M and 0.8M. The total salary budget is 35M, 25M of which are for "program services" (I guess creating content, developing the platform, etc.). This looks more reasonable compared to an organisation like Mozilla. Other things that jump out are half a million in legal fees and 1.8M for fundraising. In total, 43M out of 49M expenses in 2018 went to "program services", and they were running at a slight deficit. Looks pretty OK to me.
Assuming "information technology" means hosting, that's about 5M. Doing that times 2.5 would indeed create quite a problem, and that's assuming they don't need more people working on it to keep up with the new crowd.
[+] [-] malux85|6 years ago|reply
Most of it would be outgoing bandwidth I’d think... maybe storage as well?
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] arzel|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] malux85|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 0_gravitas|6 years ago|reply
I'm a deal past these periods in my life, and I did quite well via just arbitrary memorization, at the cost of never really developing an intuitive understanding, and therefore a true appreciation, for subjects like math. I've only recently started going through KA's courses, starting all the way back in Algebra.
[+] [-] garraeth|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dangoor|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] notduncansmith|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cerberusss|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] inimino|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] maps7|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] elric|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] avian|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dangoor|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] vasusen|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dannysu|6 years ago|reply
You can find Khan Academy's past Form 990 online and I've been archiving them.
Sal Khan made:
2008: ? ($0 revenue)
2009: ?
2010: $70,833
2011: $348,879
2012: $348,529
2013: $348,292
2014: $548,116
2015: $800,000
2016: $815,000
2017: $785,000
2018: $824,000
You can see that, just like a startup, the sacrifice in the beginning as a founder is real. Before 2010 his salary from KA was probably 0 or significantly less. $70K in 2010 was less than my new grad salary. The jump in 2011 to $350K is around how much a senior makes in HCOL areas now. There has been basically no adjustment in his earning for 4 years from 2015 to 2018.
From the 990 forms, you can also get a sense of how much other people in the organization are being paid. I think all of them can command higher compensation elsewhere, but choose to work at KA because leveling the playing field for education is such a great mission.
Sal Khan's compensation as a CEO is only ~3.x times of many senior positions in the organization. Not outrageous at all.
In 2008's Form 990, Sal Khan wrote that KA is being used by 10,000 students daily. I don't know how many accounts, but growing from that to 71 million in 2018 is incredible. The impact to the world is undeniable.
[+] [-] stupidcar|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] malandrew|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] throwaway13337|6 years ago|reply
I can't imagine, though, that servers should account for any sizable amount of overall expense. Is this really an issue for them? The linked page didn't seem to talk about it.
[+] [-] kiba|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dirtydroog|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] warent|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] djohnston|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] derision|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dangoor|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] karimf|6 years ago|reply
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjGERWYvzqk
[+] [-] drewg123|6 years ago|reply
I'm a bit biased, because I focus on CPU efficiency for a major CDN, but I'd be super curious what exactly is at 250%? Network bandwidth? CPU? IOPS? Are there big hammers that they can use to get things back under control without adding servers, like reducing bitrate, or turning off "fancy" features?
[+] [-] dangoor|6 years ago|reply
Features which use a lot of CPU are tracking learner progress, managing classrooms, and the like. These features are really important right now as teachers have moved classes online.
We are in the process of moving this code to Go, which should still be very productive for us but also reduce how much CPU is required.
[+] [-] robinhouston|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ipsum2|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zylepe|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kvz|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] discordance|6 years ago|reply
Any other suggestions?
[+] [-] Aachen|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] insertnickname|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Vinnl|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] keiferski|6 years ago|reply
https://publicdomainreview.org
[+] [-] dillonmckay|6 years ago|reply
MAPS https://maps.org/
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] alex_duf|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gigatexal|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] op03|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Joe_Ewing|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Mandatum|6 years ago|reply
Look to how Effective Altruism has setup its various entities around the world.
[+] [-] 11235813213455|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jason0597|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] polskibus|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Farfromthehood|6 years ago|reply