This is insane. I can't imagine what was going through the Venezuelan captain's head trying to do this.
It's one thing if the shooting is already started to defend yourself. But even if this stunt had worked, you're looking at many months of downtime while your ship is being repaired in drydock. Millions of dollars, and bigtime loss of capability for a small navy.
Unless you are an icebreaker, you just don't intentionally hit anything (tugboats nudge after gently making contact, they do not ram).
If this cruise liner was not following instructions (seems more like an act of piracy than legit, but that is another discussion), then you fire a shot or two off the bow of the offending ship. That usually gets people's attention.
Ramming (or "shouldering") is not that uncommon. The Chinese Coast Guard has built large, lightly-armed ships[1] partly because the size helps them ram/shoulder other ships out of the way in the course of attempting to build artificial islands and claim sovereignty in the South China Sea.
Of course, ramming an 8500-ton icebreaker with a 1500-ton corvette is a different story, and in the Venezuelan case, the stupid have been punished.
Venezuela has a habit (recently) of putting loyalty ahead of meritocracy in government positions. I would not be at all surprised if the captain had minimal actual nautical experience, but a lot of party loyalty.
I can't imagine what was going through the Venezuelan captain's head trying to do this.
These regimes see threats behind every curtain and under every plant pot. It’s possible he really believed, or had convinced himself at least, that as the article says it was full of mercenaries planning to overthrow the regime.
Those shells will do nothing to stop the ship but will just kill a lot of people for no gains. If they wanted to seize the ship, they should have brought a boarding party with them, I'm sure they have trained sailors for that.
Source: I'm a former naval officer and I served as an ordnance officer on a ship with that exact 76mm gun. I also acted as the officer of the deck for quite a few boardings.
Because pushing/ramming a bigger ship (especially if you do little damage) is more in the realm of the kind of bullying that gets tolerated by other countries than firing on a civilian ship with a heavy gun. It appears they misjudged the "little damage" part.
They weren't trying to sink the cruise ship, they were trying to turn their tiny destroyer into a tugboat and push the cruise ship into a port where it could be seized.
As I understand it, sailors have strong ethics because the sea is the common enemy of all. Even sailors on ships at war will rescue the enemy after incapacitating their boat.
"Columbia Cruise Services says Resolute remained in the area until it was clear its services were not required to help in the rescue of the 44 crew members. It then continued on, as planned, to the Port of Willemstad in Curaçao."
Then
"Even if the cruise liner had deliberately sailed within 12 miles of Isla La Tortuga, it very likely would have been legally entitled to do so under the right of innocent passage, unless Venezuelan officials believe the ship of conducting some other prohibited activity."
> Of course, this would not be the first time a country has seized, or attempted to seize, a commercial ship to exert its own pressure on its international opponents.
Seems like many HN readers are failing to make it to this line, and are assuming "crazy captain" as the motivation.
Why was the cruise ship in those waters? The ship was in the news last November about how they had no money and canceled a planned cruise, and I can't figure out what it's been doing since then.
Trump recently announced we are doubling the size of southern command and dramatically increasing our activity off the coast of Venezuela, where this occurred. Could the cruise ship have been doing something sneaky?
Highly unlikely. It looks way better for Trump to have a big grey US Navy ship with large guns off the coast of Venezuela. Why hide on an old cruise ship?
Since the US is currently trying to invade Venezuela under the guise of the fight against drugs trafficking I understand Venezuelans being more strict with their borders and would not diacard it being a setup.
What does a Portuguese ship have to do with the US? And what are you smoking to think that a fifth-rate piratical force that managed to start a fight with an unarmed, civilian ship and lose spectacularly would do any better against an actual military? You can tell that the Venezuelan navy is not currently deterring a contemplated invasion by observing that their ships (bar one) are still floating.
The US ought to invade Venezuela. It makes a whole lot more sense than invading Iraq or Syria. Venezuelans are hungry and destitute due to the regime, and the country's domestic turmoil has been spilling over into other nations where Venezuelan emigrants endure so much hardship in their travels that many of them turn to crime and panhandling just to be able to eat and have a place to sleep. It's truly disgusting the kind of inhumanity that Russia and Cuba have propped up in Venezuela.
[+] [-] ansible|6 years ago|reply
It's one thing if the shooting is already started to defend yourself. But even if this stunt had worked, you're looking at many months of downtime while your ship is being repaired in drydock. Millions of dollars, and bigtime loss of capability for a small navy.
Unless you are an icebreaker, you just don't intentionally hit anything (tugboats nudge after gently making contact, they do not ram).
If this cruise liner was not following instructions (seems more like an act of piracy than legit, but that is another discussion), then you fire a shot or two off the bow of the offending ship. That usually gets people's attention.
Ramming? WTF?
[+] [-] js2|6 years ago|reply
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/0...
https://in.reuters.com/video/watch/idOVC7T0OCH
Strange days.
[+] [-] i_am_proteus|6 years ago|reply
Of course, ramming an 8500-ton icebreaker with a 1500-ton corvette is a different story, and in the Venezuelan case, the stupid have been punished.
[1] https://thediplomat.com/2016/01/beijing-builds-monster-ship-...
(edited for grammar)
[+] [-] willvarfar|6 years ago|reply
Iceland and Britain duked it out in three major confrontations, the navies ramming each other but not firing a shot.
There are some truly spectacular videos on YouTube etc.
[+] [-] bpodgursky|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] m4rtink|6 years ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Lissa_(1866)
One can't possibly blame the captain wanting to be as cool as admiral Tegetthoff back then:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Anton_Romako_001.jpg
[+] [-] goatinaboat|6 years ago|reply
These regimes see threats behind every curtain and under every plant pot. It’s possible he really believed, or had convinced himself at least, that as the article says it was full of mercenaries planning to overthrow the regime.
[+] [-] eatbitseveryday|6 years ago|reply
Well, the article does quote this, which sort of makes sense. Doesn’t seem like a totally insane idea, just really poorly implemented.
> The navy vessel continued to ram the starboard bow in an apparent attempt to turn the ship’s head towards Venezuelan territorial waters.
[+] [-] Scarbutt|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hirundo|6 years ago|reply
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTO_Melara_76_mm
Why would you ram when you could shoot up the other ship with 85 to 120 fourteen pound shells per minute, with no risk to your own ship?
Maybe they didn't actually have the ammo. Or maybe they decided to play chicken with the cruise ship and lost.
[+] [-] battery_cowboy|6 years ago|reply
Source: I'm a former naval officer and I served as an ordnance officer on a ship with that exact 76mm gun. I also acted as the officer of the deck for quite a few boardings.
[+] [-] detaro|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jandrese|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jvanderbot|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Scarbutt|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fbonetti|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lonelappde|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] antpls|6 years ago|reply
"Columbia Cruise Services says Resolute remained in the area until it was clear its services were not required to help in the rescue of the 44 crew members. It then continued on, as planned, to the Port of Willemstad in Curaçao."
Then
"Even if the cruise liner had deliberately sailed within 12 miles of Isla La Tortuga, it very likely would have been legally entitled to do so under the right of innocent passage, unless Venezuelan officials believe the ship of conducting some other prohibited activity."
[+] [-] toomuchtodo|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] a3n|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] firekvz|6 years ago|reply
Kinda shows that they might be on blame
Ps: Venezuelan here and I hate my gov but this looks really shaddy
[+] [-] fouc|6 years ago|reply
Seems like many HN readers are failing to make it to this line, and are assuming "crazy captain" as the motivation.
[+] [-] tuukkah|6 years ago|reply
Seems buying one made in Finland can be a lucky charm as ice breaking is obligatory here.
[+] [-] boomboomsubban|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] djmips|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mixmastamyk|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hazeii|6 years ago|reply
https://www.columbia-cs.com/statement-on-rcgs-resolute-incid...
[+] [-] knbknb|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Ballas|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dzaragozar|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LatteLazy|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 9nGQluzmnq3M|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adonovan|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] z2210558|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stevespang|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] smoyer|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] WalterBright|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] geoffmunn|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] malcolmwhite|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] duxup|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] t0mas88|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sjg007|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ck2|6 years ago|reply
Imagine what is happening inside North Korea we will never hear about. The population will be quietly cut in half.
Putin has been doing some (more) scary things in Russia while no-one outside is paying attention.
I'm still not completely convinced we are going to be allowed to have elections in November.
[+] [-] starpilot|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] birdyrooster|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sudoaza|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MrMorden|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] analognoise|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] totalZero|6 years ago|reply