top | item 22872109 (no title) DougGwyn | 5 years ago If you changed UTF-16 to UTF-32 or UCS-4 I'd support it. I think there are already implementations that use the replacement character for all "impossible" codes. discuss order hn newest hsivonen|5 years ago What’s your use case for UTF-32? DougGwyn|5 years ago There are several multibyte character manipulations that are easier if there is a uniform-sized encoding (wchar_t).
hsivonen|5 years ago What’s your use case for UTF-32? DougGwyn|5 years ago There are several multibyte character manipulations that are easier if there is a uniform-sized encoding (wchar_t).
DougGwyn|5 years ago There are several multibyte character manipulations that are easier if there is a uniform-sized encoding (wchar_t).
hsivonen|5 years ago
DougGwyn|5 years ago