TBH, it's nothing to do with those lazy petitions. This happened because the CA's AG chose to be a good guy, leveraged his power and put a lot of effort into fighting the bad guys. I'm sure he's been offered fat kickbacks and received thinly veiled treats. After this stunt he won't be offered a high ranked corporate position to scheme shady things and won't be able to buy yachts and helicopters left and right. That's basically the price he's paid. I think attributing this win to some "voices" would be dishonest.
TheRealPomax|5 years ago
kbenson|5 years ago
If that's just too wild to consider, it probably also looks good come next election.
dchyrdvh|5 years ago
Good people give food to homeless because they see value in doing so, not because they fear repercussions from public opinion.
burkaman|5 years ago
dchyrdvh|5 years ago
_jal|5 years ago
Other than your cynicism about the effectiveness of petitioning for redress, why do you think this is true?
What in Becerra's background makes you think he's angling for a revolving-door job?
Other than you showing us that you "know" how the "game" is played, what can you back this view up with? Something seems lazy here, and it isn't the people writing letters.
blibble|5 years ago
they're selling domain names, not running an oil major or large defence contractor