(no title)
PappaPatat | 5 years ago
No more draining discussion if AV needed to be installed on particular systems, the right to wipe any employees desk or laptop in case of "issues", create outbound firewall rules (yes those where new, and yes it saved a lot of damage 3 years later when Slammer hit, but that's another story) and budget to install "monitoring services" on whatever we'd like.
The total data loss was limited, the costs of employees not being able to work was a lot worst.
MithrilTuxedo|5 years ago
I thought it was rude to pay for an OS and then have to pay separately for software to protect that OS. It seemed off to me that the guy who wrote Melissa got jail time, but nothing happened to those who sold the software needed to run viruses.
I stopped having Windows installed after Slammer hit. After almost two decades away, I got a job at a big American company that issues Windows laptops and lo-and-behold there's some seperately purchsed AV software installed.
It makes the laptop a space heater. If I don't explicitly shut it down, the AV software never drops below 30% CPU and the thing's fans never stop running. They accidentally dropped AV for a couple weeks when they upgraded my machine from Windows 7 to 10 and it shaved five minutes off a ~17 minute Maven build. I'm one employ of tens or hundreds of thousands producing all this extraneous waste heat.
My friends needle me about BitCoin's environmental impact. I ask them what the overhead of AV has been.
notechback|5 years ago
That said, both are wasteful and ultimately neither should exist.
unknown|5 years ago
[deleted]
vanderZwan|5 years ago
bartread|5 years ago
pedrocr|5 years ago
The productivity costs of all those mitigating measures shouldn't be ignored either. Modern corporate Windows images are incredible in how much CPU and RAM they can waste even at idle.
dzhiurgis|5 years ago
JoeAltmaier|5 years ago
But it was certainly a wake-up call. And such a simple trick, to fool the world in a day.