(no title)
ADefenestrator | 5 years ago
It was.. sort of cheaper. They didn't actually build the servers, and as described the server wouldn't work (onboard SATA didn't support port multipliers, lack of ECC would probably cause problems in practice, bit hand-wavey on power/space/network/manpower costs, etc). The goal of the article was to get other people to build cheap storage and put it up for rent on their network. They do have some amount of storage space available for very cheap on the network now, but personally I suspect it's people who figured "what the heck, I'll give it a try!" as opposed to people actually building storage servers and making a profit renting them out.
I was honestly pretty disappointed - I'd hoped they'd found a cheap motherboard with ECC and support for port multipliers, but nope.
Dylan16807|5 years ago
Edit: The motherboard they picked does support ECC memory, anyway. In general ASRock models do.
ADefenestrator|5 years ago
You're right though - since the client's doing the work and they have a lot of redundancy/diversity in the storage it's not as big of a deal for them as it would be for us. I'd be a bit wary because the client-only verification does mean that there's no verification-with-ECC step in the entire chain, but I'm not sure that's significantly worse in terms of actual risk.
justinclift|5 years ago
ADefenestrator|5 years ago