This is a failure in leadership at UberEats. Uber has more than one revenue source and delivery is in high demand, UberEats is severely losing to DoorDash in food delivery, despite Uber having significantly more resources than DoorDash. Uber has billions in the bank, Doordash only has hundreds of millions. At the time of this posting, Doordash is currently number #13 in the App store, UberEats is sitting at #62. Uber has access to capital and reserve in the bank. Reserves are often used for a rainy day, well it is pouring now. They should be using their position to gain market share during this time of peak demand for deliveries, should not be losing to DoorDash.
epylar|5 years ago
Nextgrid|5 years ago
Both cases ended up with a chargeback.
Deliveroo is similar, they banned a 2 year old account used multiple times every day (for both me and my flatmates) with over 2k spent on it for supposed fraud when I dared to ask for "too many" refunds because of cold/incorrect food (if you place many orders you have more probability that something goes wrong, but their "fraud" scoring algorithm - that also influences whether you can get one-click refunds directly in the app - doesn't seem to take that into account).
Both Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats also often lie and blame the restaurant for being slow when they can't assign a driver. I've had multiple occurrences where an order is stuck on "Driver waiting at the restaurant" for 20+ minutes but calling the restaurant reveals that the food was ready long ago and nobody is coming to pick it up.
paranoidrobot|5 years ago
While I'd prefer not to use UberEats, they've basically become the only option for a large number of restaurants around.
I've ordered food from a variety of places, including large internationally recognised chains.
About 20% of orders have something wrong. Sometimes it's minor things. Othertimes it's significant - like drinks and dishes missing.
So, I report them to Uber, and get a refund.
However now I get these snarky customer service form emails a few days later that gives these snide tips like "To better improve your delivery experience - make sure to be ready to collect your order promptly" followed by a semi-veiled threats of "We take fraud seriously and will terminate any suspicious accounts"
I'd be more than happy to submit photos or videos showing that the delivery driver gave me one bag when it's marked "1 of 2", or what items were actually in the bag - but no, just shit customer service.
e: I forgot to add - there's also zero way to contact them other than for a specific order.
I wanted to report to them a number of fake restaurants that someone is running out of their apartment. (The restaurant address is an actual residential apartment building, there's no commercial kitchen) There's no way to do that.
rajup|5 years ago
ccktlmazeltov|5 years ago
jboydyhacker|5 years ago
mathattack|5 years ago
victor106|5 years ago
The owners of a few restaurants I frequent all seem to hate these apps for how much they charge them. I heard approximately 30-40%. Sure they do bring in customers specially now but 30-40% seems too high if you consider what it costs the apps.
mifreewil|5 years ago
Just read the App Store reviews for UberEats. If a driver isn’t able to deliver successfully they just cancel the order and blame the customer by default. Contacting customer support is met with robotic replies and they refuse refund.
Last time I just did a chargeback and won’t use them again.
Teever|5 years ago
quacker|5 years ago
PunchTornado|5 years ago
madeofpalk|5 years ago
I initially thought it would be higher due to people isolating and now shopping, but a lot of people now have less disposable income to spend on expensive food delivery. Also less availability (restaurants closing down)
usaar333|5 years ago
apexalpha|5 years ago
For many restaurants this is the only income they have and it's highly encouraged to order some.
Not many people have gone down in disposable income, though. That might be a factor.
Traster|5 years ago
34679|5 years ago
1. People have more free time from being stuck at home, unable to work, so less need to rely on delivery apps.
2. People get tired of being stuck at home and one of the few permitted reasons to leave is acquiring food.
cortesoft|5 years ago
oarabbus_|5 years ago
People who already had the means to rely on Uber Eats, continue to do so. But the rest quickly realize that paying $22 for a meal instead of $8 isn't worth it
bgs113|5 years ago
rockarage|5 years ago
unknown|5 years ago
[deleted]
mennis16|5 years ago
marcinzm|5 years ago
GrubHub charges the restaurant a percentage, it just hides that in the cost of the food on it's platform rather than making it explicit.
kingbirdy|5 years ago
hcnews|5 years ago
alaskamiller|5 years ago
Additionally, UE software is bloated and user-hostile compared to DD and GH.
jariel|5 years ago
Uber Eats does not have 'billions' - Uber does. The 'cost' of that market share is unknown - who is subsidising and by how much more?
Maybe 'Uber Eats' is a 'marginal strategy' in that they can leverage the slack time of their drivers into doing something else.
Market Share varies from country to country.
They may actually be using their $ to gain market share right now, why would you imply otherwise.
Their layoff could be for any number of reasons: convenient opportunity to trim the fat, close down some projects and do a 'one time writeoff', it maybe mostly just a covid reality. It's possible they are laying off more heavily in areas that don't have Uber Eats.
Billions in the Bank is not for a 'rainy day' it's for any and all sorts of things.
It would take some specific information with respect to Uber Eats to see how well they were doing with it.
asdff|5 years ago
whiskyant|5 years ago
UberEats app is somewhat buggy too. I also feel they lose out when it comes to overall restaurant selection.
Nextgrid|5 years ago
Charging back those orders would be the right thing to do to discourage such behaviour.
shrimpx|5 years ago
tehwebguy|5 years ago
Fees are about to be a big issue though -- to the end user UberEats is a full $2.99 more expensive than Postmates for < $15 subtotal orders. I don't know if that means Postmates is taking an extra $2.99 from the restaurant for those orders.
Either way though, the % of restaurants' orders going through delivery services surely just went up dramatically so those fees are now going to make a bigger impact, I'm sure we'll see the ecosystem change soon.
leetcrew|5 years ago
mennis16|5 years ago
The only other app I noticed doing this is Caviar. Perhaps they assume that people ordering from steakhouses will largely not care about the extra service fee, so it makes more business sense to jack up the price as much as possible. But personally it has stopped me from ordering on multiple occasions.
mav3rick|5 years ago
xxpor|5 years ago
ghaff|5 years ago
ww520|5 years ago
simonebrunozzi|5 years ago
In this case, you still need to considerably cut your workforce, to be able to use that cash for a "very long" rainy day.
Just IMHO. I can be completely wrong on all accounts.
mulmen|5 years ago
grandmczeb|5 years ago
ashtonkem|5 years ago
That app is awful. It took me six tries to login, because I genuinely couldn’t figure out that the “ok” button was a tiny black bar all the way at the bottom of the screen (I was using an iPad). I also struggled to change my default address from Chicago to LA, and almost ordered food in Chicago after changing my home address in the app. At multiple steps during the ordering process the UI randomly changed, making it really hard for me to find what I was looking for.
I’m not surprised that Uber Eats isn’t winning. Once my coupons are done I’m uninstalling that app and going back to Door Dash.
askafriend|5 years ago
tinyhouse|5 years ago
rockarage|5 years ago
servercobra|5 years ago
Animats|5 years ago
Uber isn't that good when they can't afford to operate at a loss. Their real edge was too much money from Softbank.
MattGaiser|5 years ago
I'm surprised to learn that DoorDash doesn't have the resources as they are giving away a lot of coupons.
unknown|5 years ago
[deleted]
sreekotay|5 years ago
xwdv|5 years ago
simonebrunozzi|5 years ago
I don't think that any specific individual "deserves" to be punished for having worked at a company like Uber. There might be exceptions, and there might be a few specific individuals that crossed the line, but most people do their work and behave with honesty, and they don't deserve your negativity.
draw_down|5 years ago