This is at least the 5th time I have asked you directly, and it is the first time you have replied. So yes, you would refuse to tell me. I do not see how you could interpret any of my posts as breaking the first two, and it is very obvious that you single me out because you want to control the narrative in regards to the last two. How is "we should kill everyone who doesn't believe in the climate hoax" not flamebait? How is it substantive, thoughtful or new? But suggesting that maybe murdering people because they aren't brainwashed is wrong, that's the real problem with modern discourse right?
No comments yet.