(no title)
burgreblast | 5 years ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22980932
There was much speculation, but many people agreed that in 2 weeks we would have super interesting data.
It's been 17 days. We have an update from ohio.gov that tested individuals climbed to 7536, 4439 are positive (59%), total 49 deaths (.01)
Not an epidemiologist. Does this data fit the Diamond Princess model? Or more broadly, which model fits this data best?
Is there other data to show how many became symptomatic? How do we interpret this update, more than 2 weeks after initial reports?
sirsar|5 years ago
If you're going to report other ratios as percentages, could you please be consistent? I initially erroneously read this as 0.01% deaths, which would be an absolutely enormous update, but 1% isn't surprising at all.
ecpottinger|5 years ago
vkou|5 years ago
The problem is that prisoners routinely share common spaces. It doesn't matter how the air circulates, when they all cook, eat, work, shower, and exercise in the exact same communal rooms.
Combine that with insufficient sanitation, and it's a miracle that only half of them got sick.
cbarrick|5 years ago
I think you're counting tests, not people. Those numbers double count inmates who receive multiple tests, and it's likely that those who have tested positive will receive frequent retests.
FYI there's just under 40k total inmates.
vondur|5 years ago
unknown|5 years ago
[deleted]
Gibbon1|5 years ago
If you just look at the stats initially you run into the problem that a lot of infected are preasymptomatic are in the early course of infection. So retrospective stats are very important.
brohoolio|5 years ago
stx|5 years ago
csomar|5 years ago
npunt|5 years ago
kiba|5 years ago