top | item 2318470

Before and After pictures of Japan

122 points| foresterh | 15 years ago |abc.net.au | reply

18 comments

order
[+] aw3c2|15 years ago|reply
The "after" pictures are in a different tint or colour scheme which means they are biased (or rather, you are biased by the colours like the missing green). Bad comparison.
[+] lloeki|15 years ago|reply
Différent hue yet you can't not be struck by the sheer expression of powerful devastation of those pictures.
[+] bane|15 years ago|reply
I think the presence of buildings in the before, and the absence of buildings in the after is pretty noticeable color or no color.
[+] rst|15 years ago|reply
The clearer contrast is in the built-up areas in "before" photos that are wiped clean of man-made structures "after". It's hard to imagine how anyone in or near those survived.

I wasn't paying nearly as much attention to the colors, myself...

[+] pyre|15 years ago|reply
Why are the images tinted though? They did the same interface for some flooding that happened in Australia, and the 'after' images were also tinted similarly.
[+] gus_massa|15 years ago|reply
Some photos have a no-destructed area that is useful for comparing the differences in the colors.

  #8: Kashima in Minamisoma
  #9: Haranomachi in Minamisoma
[+] rue|15 years ago|reply
I could be spatially challenged enough to not really see it, as the imagery is lacking perspective, but these pictures aren't much after seeing the video footage of the waves rolling in. That was a much starker (re-)realization of their power, similar to 2004.

Perhaps images from a helicopter or high ground would be more evocative.

[+] yoshiks|15 years ago|reply
I, I cannot write my accurate feeling to the article. It is amazing as web interface, but these images almost make me cry...
[+] foenix|15 years ago|reply
This interface is so good it's freaky. It's too good. It makes me feel almost responsible for the power of that wave — even as every rational cell in my body begs me that this is not so.
[+] tkahn6|15 years ago|reply
What is the point of "I, I [...]"?
[+] andrewgulus|15 years ago|reply
Third picture from the bottom, a new building magically appears in the after picture
[+] timerickson|15 years ago|reply
Old satellite imagery in the "before" shot, meaning that building is fairly brand new if a bit recently weathered.
[+] ars|15 years ago|reply
Apparently the earthquake moved the whole island by about 8 meters!

I wonder how that's going to affect GPS maps. 8 meters is enough to put you in a different street on your map.

Edit: Oops. 2.4 meters, about 8 feet.

[+] radu_floricica|15 years ago|reply
8 feet - a little less then 3 meters. But impressive nonetheless.
[+] qjz|15 years ago|reply
As a tool, these visual diffs are amazing. I'd love to see this feature built into the Google Maps satellite view.
[+] kifou1|15 years ago|reply
Very nice link thanks.With those pictures, we can realize how terrific was the impact of this tsunami..
[+] rabidsnail|15 years ago|reply
Please don't use hover for performing actions; your page won't work on touchscreen browsers.