The "after" pictures are in a different tint or colour scheme which means they are biased (or rather, you are biased by the colours like the missing green). Bad comparison.
The clearer contrast is in the built-up areas in "before" photos that are wiped clean of man-made structures "after". It's hard to imagine how anyone in or near those survived.
I wasn't paying nearly as much attention to the colors, myself...
Why are the images tinted though? They did the same interface for some flooding that happened in Australia, and the 'after' images were also tinted similarly.
I could be spatially challenged enough to not really see it, as the imagery is lacking perspective, but these pictures aren't much after seeing the video footage of the waves rolling in. That was a much starker (re-)realization of their power, similar to 2004.
Perhaps images from a helicopter or high ground would be more evocative.
This interface is so good it's freaky. It's too good. It makes me feel almost responsible for the power of that wave — even as every rational cell in my body begs me that this is not so.
[+] [-] aw3c2|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lloeki|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bane|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rst|15 years ago|reply
I wasn't paying nearly as much attention to the colors, myself...
[+] [-] pyre|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gus_massa|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rue|15 years ago|reply
Perhaps images from a helicopter or high ground would be more evocative.
[+] [-] yoshiks|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] foenix|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tkahn6|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andrewgulus|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] timerickson|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ars|15 years ago|reply
I wonder how that's going to affect GPS maps. 8 meters is enough to put you in a different street on your map.
Edit: Oops. 2.4 meters, about 8 feet.
[+] [-] radu_floricica|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] qjz|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kifou1|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rabidsnail|15 years ago|reply