Flickr seems to have a good social aspect but other than that I detest their web interface and don't understand how or why people use it. It seems designed to make it hard to casually browse photos, inserting a painful full page reload in between every image I click. PicasaWeb is miles easier to use. Ironically, I don't really like the Picasa rich client so I use a different tool and configure it to upload to PicasaWeb.
Which tool do you use? I've been considering switching to Picasa recently. [1]
[1] I've held off because my GAFYD account seems to be in the "transition limbo" that occurs when you have accounts on services like Analytics. I'm doing my best to hold off on any new Google services until this all gets resolved.
I don't see what's the big deal here? This is The Valley! People move around. So many people have left Google, and yet we don't see a "Google fiddles while . . . " headline from TechCrunch.
The big deal is that many people see Yahoo as a company that time has passed by. There was a time when its properties were the tops. Everyone used Yahoo Mail or AOL, Flickr was the tops if you wanted to share photos, Yahoo.com was the home page of so many more and they used Yahoo search. Today, a lot of our community looks at Yahoo and sees a search engine they wouldn't want to use, a bloated homepage more about flash than utility, a Yahoo Mail that doesn't hold a candle to Gmail, etc. EXCEPT: Flickr. Flickr's still pretty good. Facebook has overtaken Flickr, but Flickr still offers more high-res options, decent topical search, a clean interface that's been spared a lot of the nonsense Yahoo is pushing, etc. But it hasn't progressed lately.
If Yahoo is to make a comeback, they need the types that have been in charge of Flickr (or so the community's reasoning goes). Flickr is the one thing we like that Yahoo's doing (well, maybe add Delicious in there too). And yet Yahoo is letting those properties languish and the talent that works on those properties leave. Sure, Google loses talent, but generally speaking I don't find certain Google properties to have an interface that is so markedly terrible compared to other Google properties. Our community looks at Google's ventures and while they might not understand social, we see that there's a decent consistency of engineering. However, we do look at Yahoo's different properties and many feel like they came from a different company - partly because Yahoo bought their way into Delicious, Flickr, and Upcoming (yea, I added another that I've almost never used).
Imagine that Google had bought YouTube and YouTube's interface and engineering was just so markedly better (to you) than the rest of Google's properties. Then the employees who created this, in your view, superior product started leaving constantly. You'd think: c'mon Google, you bought yourself into the good stuff and we want to those engineers bring that good stuff to the rest of your line, not leave with their products languishing!
People move around, but I think many of us feel that Yahoo has markedly varying quality depending on the division of the company. It might not have any actual significance and engineers might not be leaving those divisions more often than other divisions, but it does have an emotional significance for our community. Many thought that Flickr heralded a new Yahoo. It makes it feel like Yahoo doesn't get where it's gone wrong (in our ultra-hip, we know what's best not some CEO the investors have hired, why isn't the world listening to me as I type away at my keyboard on the internets way).
/Apologies for speaking for everyone; it's more just a theory.
Anyone wanting to build the next Flickr, let us know. We're looking to provide the tools to tie such a product to existing social graphs, and to handle migrating photos, lists and feedback to the next big social photo service.
E-mail me (listed in my profile) if you're wanting to talk about building a social photo app on the Windsoc API.
I forget the last time I uploaded a photo to Flickr. Somehow, without any conscious decision, it's just stopped being part of my flow. Perhaps it's that not many of my friends and family see what I post (I live overseas from most of my family and friends), perhaps it's the seemingly constant begging for me to "come back" to a pro membership (nothing is a turn off as much as desperation), maybe it's just that Facebook is winning and someone else has to lose.
And just to add, I really like Flickr. The interface for organising photos is streets ahead of Facebook. And as an amateur photographer, I enjoy looking at others' work and seeing the exif data to see what camera and settings were used.
Buy somehow it's not enough to make me want to stay.
SmugMug lacks the social angle is that is important to some photographers (including myself). Self-promotion via Flickr is incredibly easy - their metrics on each of your uploads is incredibly useful also (for gauging general public interest in your work).
Flickr is less about your personal gallery - it's more about a universe of images, made easily discoverable, and easily shareable and discussable. SmugMug is definitely more of a "your hosted gallery" service, which is useful as a portfolio for photographers (and a sales point, via their tightly integrated print sales), but is really not comparable to Flickr as a social and promotional tool. I really enjoy exploring and looking at the work of superior photographers and learning from that - losing Flickr would be a huge blow to the photography community. SmugMug is not nearly so discoverable.
I have a friend who's been using SmugMug for a while. He likes it better than Flickr and seems to have had a very positive experience with the service overall. I was considering using it myself.
I was an enthusiastic Flickr user starting about 6 years ago or so. It had an excellent feature set and was even fairly reasonably priced.
However, Flickr has barely changed (at best only minor cosmetic changes) in that time frame while the entire rest of the web has transformed around them. Absolutely free image sharing on the web is now ubiquitous (imgur, twitpic, etc.) The smartphone market has exploded, the state of modern web development has advanced greatly, and social platforms (twitter, facebook, etc.) have utterly transformed the landscape. Meanwhile, hosting and bandwidth has gotten much cheaper though flickr's pricing model remains the same.
I think Flickr's business model is now irrevocably broken, they are surviving off of fumes at this point.
I have wanted a Flickr competitor with start-up culture and mentality for a while. I feel reticent about uploading my private photos to Flickr, because Flickr don't have any second layers of authentication.
I'm convinced that there's a great start-up opportunity here.
I have wanted a Flickr competitor with start-up culture and mentality for a while
Kind of like Flickr was back when they were a startup?
I want a competitor who can exist and provide hassle-free service for at least a decade, and my standards are always rising. I can't spend all my time jumping ship from one "start out, sell out, burn out" company to the next.
Yes, there is an opportunity: to provide a service that is sustainable.
[+] [-] zmmmmm|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sjs382|15 years ago|reply
[1] I've held off because my GAFYD account seems to be in the "transition limbo" that occurs when you have accounts on services like Analytics. I'm doing my best to hold off on any new Google services until this all gets resolved.
[+] [-] jrubyer|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ajays|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] johnnygood|15 years ago|reply
If Yahoo is to make a comeback, they need the types that have been in charge of Flickr (or so the community's reasoning goes). Flickr is the one thing we like that Yahoo's doing (well, maybe add Delicious in there too). And yet Yahoo is letting those properties languish and the talent that works on those properties leave. Sure, Google loses talent, but generally speaking I don't find certain Google properties to have an interface that is so markedly terrible compared to other Google properties. Our community looks at Google's ventures and while they might not understand social, we see that there's a decent consistency of engineering. However, we do look at Yahoo's different properties and many feel like they came from a different company - partly because Yahoo bought their way into Delicious, Flickr, and Upcoming (yea, I added another that I've almost never used).
Imagine that Google had bought YouTube and YouTube's interface and engineering was just so markedly better (to you) than the rest of Google's properties. Then the employees who created this, in your view, superior product started leaving constantly. You'd think: c'mon Google, you bought yourself into the good stuff and we want to those engineers bring that good stuff to the rest of your line, not leave with their products languishing!
People move around, but I think many of us feel that Yahoo has markedly varying quality depending on the division of the company. It might not have any actual significance and engineers might not be leaving those divisions more often than other divisions, but it does have an emotional significance for our community. Many thought that Flickr heralded a new Yahoo. It makes it feel like Yahoo doesn't get where it's gone wrong (in our ultra-hip, we know what's best not some CEO the investors have hired, why isn't the world listening to me as I type away at my keyboard on the internets way).
/Apologies for speaking for everyone; it's more just a theory.
[+] [-] wolfrom|15 years ago|reply
E-mail me (listed in my profile) if you're wanting to talk about building a social photo app on the Windsoc API.
[+] [-] callmeed|15 years ago|reply
The next free/social Flickr is Facebook
The next pro Flickr is SmugMug
[+] [-] mopoke|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mopoke|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dflock|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] potatolicious|15 years ago|reply
Flickr is less about your personal gallery - it's more about a universe of images, made easily discoverable, and easily shareable and discussable. SmugMug is definitely more of a "your hosted gallery" service, which is useful as a portfolio for photographers (and a sales point, via their tightly integrated print sales), but is really not comparable to Flickr as a social and promotional tool. I really enjoy exploring and looking at the work of superior photographers and learning from that - losing Flickr would be a huge blow to the photography community. SmugMug is not nearly so discoverable.
[+] [-] patrickdowell|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sp332|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] InclinedPlane|15 years ago|reply
However, Flickr has barely changed (at best only minor cosmetic changes) in that time frame while the entire rest of the web has transformed around them. Absolutely free image sharing on the web is now ubiquitous (imgur, twitpic, etc.) The smartphone market has exploded, the state of modern web development has advanced greatly, and social platforms (twitter, facebook, etc.) have utterly transformed the landscape. Meanwhile, hosting and bandwidth has gotten much cheaper though flickr's pricing model remains the same.
I think Flickr's business model is now irrevocably broken, they are surviving off of fumes at this point.
[+] [-] unknown|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] kmfrk|15 years ago|reply
I'm convinced that there's a great start-up opportunity here.
[+] [-] extension|15 years ago|reply
Kind of like Flickr was back when they were a startup?
I want a competitor who can exist and provide hassle-free service for at least a decade, and my standards are always rising. I can't spend all my time jumping ship from one "start out, sell out, burn out" company to the next.
Yes, there is an opportunity: to provide a service that is sustainable.
[+] [-] petervandijck|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jobenjo|15 years ago|reply
Looks like it could be a decent Flickr alternative.