(no title)
Bantros | 5 years ago
Edit: Though under reasonable terms, including exercise and food shopping. If you have only obeying the slogans, which was my point, well that's unfortunate
Bantros | 5 years ago
Edit: Though under reasonable terms, including exercise and food shopping. If you have only obeying the slogans, which was my point, well that's unfortunate
DanBC|5 years ago
Again, only with reasonable excuse. He didn't have a reasonable excuse. The law says
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/350/regulation/6/ma...
> 6.—(1) During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.
It then lists some reasonable excuses. Travelling to a second home is not listed in the reasonable excuses.
The government guidance is important because it provides context to "reasonable" -- it expands the list of reasonable excuses.
The guidance at the time was "You must stay at home", "you must not travel", "you must not travel to a second home".
The Crown Prosecution Service guidance is important because it curtails police action. The CPS guidance was similarly clear: travelling to a second home is unlikely to be reasonable, unless it's someone fleeing domestic abuse.
Police guidance tells us how they would have handled Cummings if they'd stopped him as he travelled from London to Durham. The police have said that they'd have turned him back.
Very many people have been fined for doing exactly what Cummings did, and those fines are not going to be withdrawn.