top | item 23374579

(no title)

throwlaplace | 5 years ago

Another case

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-po...

>The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.

discuss

order

No comments yet.