(no title)
chacha102 | 5 years ago
The word "REPEAT" should not be used in place of "SAY AGAIN",
especially in the vicinity of naval or other firing ranges,
as "REPEAT" is an artillery proword defined in ACP 125 U.S.
Supp-2(A) with the wholly different meaning of "request for the
same volume of fire to be fired again with or without corrections
or changes" (e.g., at the same coordinates as the previous round).[12]
You'd think something as destructive as artillery fire might be given a slightly longer and less common word...
thanhhaimai|5 years ago
Not like gaming is comparable to real combat, but a hundred milliseconds is a lot in life & death situations.
chacha102|5 years ago
Whereas "REPEAT" might not involve the time luxury.
pouta|5 years ago
hobos_delight|5 years ago
However it is unlikely to occur in practice - the artillery battery will (generally) be on a separate radio net, and the proword will only be applicable if you're in an active fire mission - though it's good to be safe. My wife still gets frustrated with my use of SAY AGAIN.
When you get a good sig on each end, the speed of fire mission comms is a thing of beauty - and once the mission is opened both ends will drop all callsigns.
ronjouch|5 years ago
ARandomerDude|5 years ago
The "repeat" vs "say again" distinction is so ingrained that I've been out of the military for a decade and I still always, only say "say again." I don't do it on purpose, it's just part of me now.
JackFr|5 years ago
inamberclad|5 years ago
toyg|5 years ago
chacha102|5 years ago
eitland|5 years ago
I often use say again, but I use it because of of Limoncelly and Hogans book, "the Practice of Systems and Networks Administration" where they (or someone they refer to) suggest it works better in noisy environments.
I guess they have worked with someone with experience from the army..?