top | item 23516799

(no title)

chiefsucker | 5 years ago

What the heck? A regular user doesn’t understand or care what the technical difference between a “regular” page and AMP is. I wouldn’t call this ignorance per se.

discuss

order

choeger|5 years ago

Not knowing and not caring is the very definition of ignorance.

Sometimes I wonder if feudalism must have felt like this from the perspective of the noble people. Will there be a dark age followed by enlightenment? Because right now we seem to encounter self-imposed nonage.

RHSeeger|5 years ago

This is patently false. I talk to non-tech "regular" users all the time that despise AMP.

chiefsucker|5 years ago

This is patently false. I talk to non-tech "regular" users all the time that don’t know what I’m talking about when I mention AMP and its issues.

Wistar|5 years ago

Count me among them.

ehnto|5 years ago

Just because they don't care doesn't mean exploiting their ignorance is okay. I don't know that I agree with the GP that this is a targeted move to get AMP to slide under the radar, but if it is we should totally care. AMP undermines the fabric of the web. Just wait for the day that Google starts serving AMP for sites that aren't even configured for it. When they serve an AMP page, they are doing more than being a middle man, they are controlling the traffic and the display of the site, and the user is none the wiser. Google penalizes you for doing the same thing, specifically because it's nefarious.

Mirioron|5 years ago

I'm pretty sure regular people can tell the difference between a regular page and an AMP page. The AMP page simply doesn't work right and it's quite difficult to miss that.

runawaybottle|5 years ago

Also you have to go out of your way to share the original link so people know what site and descriptive link you are sharing.

AMP adds 2-3 additional actions to that user flow.