top | item 23523237 (no title) mothepro | 5 years ago Not necessarily, TURN servers should only be required for strict NAT. It seems that 92%* for connections are not behind strict NATs.*https://developers.google.com/talk/libjingle/important_conce... discuss order hn newest bkanber|5 years ago STUN fails under symmetric NAT, not strict NAT. That google document makes no citations of that 92% figure, but I assume that's for desktop traffic only. Pretty much all mobile/cellular connections would require TURN too. cma|5 years ago I haven't found Verizon or AT&T to need TURN, but maybe clients on them would if connecting to each other. FR10|5 years ago In my tests with 10 people 5 needed TURN, ISPs in my country are really something special.
bkanber|5 years ago STUN fails under symmetric NAT, not strict NAT. That google document makes no citations of that 92% figure, but I assume that's for desktop traffic only. Pretty much all mobile/cellular connections would require TURN too. cma|5 years ago I haven't found Verizon or AT&T to need TURN, but maybe clients on them would if connecting to each other.
cma|5 years ago I haven't found Verizon or AT&T to need TURN, but maybe clients on them would if connecting to each other.
FR10|5 years ago In my tests with 10 people 5 needed TURN, ISPs in my country are really something special.
bkanber|5 years ago
cma|5 years ago
FR10|5 years ago