top | item 23558566 (no title) russler23 | 5 years ago Justifying lethal force against people running away astounds me.It’s one thing if you’re running away with nuclear launch codes, but I’m skeptical that was the case here. discuss order hn newest unknown|5 years ago [deleted] mmm_grayons|5 years ago He was running away with a weapon, though. It's not an easy choice, but better a criminal get shot than he go hurt an innocent civilian. saagarjha|5 years ago People have access to actual, lethal weapons all the time! (This is especially true in the US.) That doesn't mean you can just go around shooting people on the off chance that they might go using them against others. load replies (2) lostlogin|5 years ago The third option was to have no one die or get shot.
mmm_grayons|5 years ago He was running away with a weapon, though. It's not an easy choice, but better a criminal get shot than he go hurt an innocent civilian. saagarjha|5 years ago People have access to actual, lethal weapons all the time! (This is especially true in the US.) That doesn't mean you can just go around shooting people on the off chance that they might go using them against others. load replies (2) lostlogin|5 years ago The third option was to have no one die or get shot.
saagarjha|5 years ago People have access to actual, lethal weapons all the time! (This is especially true in the US.) That doesn't mean you can just go around shooting people on the off chance that they might go using them against others. load replies (2)
unknown|5 years ago
[deleted]
mmm_grayons|5 years ago
saagarjha|5 years ago
lostlogin|5 years ago